DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references;
        b=JHpoE4LTAG1JusZzrdxGevbRrIpvNGuRODcttb8VDpMkd3m8+RwWL85dIDSiiKeBAm+Fl+SCrdO+zv0zxV+eldDmxQwKG/9XVVNNgcuXW9mx6ytRWMKUB/7U+Ifx49kQOL/JFfn3g8wmBBdipc3l6RNAjDSaipbjhWme/wNwQZI=
Message-ID: <12d58c1605031613266c2f8dcc@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2005 16:26:55 -0500
From: Adam COOPER <adamgarrigus@gmail.com>
To: lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org
Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: nu fanva zoi gy. I pledge allegiance... .gy
In-Reply-To: <20050316202539.89477.qmail@web41901.mail.yahoo.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
References: <20050316202539.89477.qmail@web41901.mail.yahoo.com>
Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@chain.digitalkingdom.org
Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@chain.digitalkingdom.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-to: lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org
Content-Length: 693

> Any example not in the first person, or not in the present tense
> will do:

Got it. Thanks.

> As long as the lands in A are worth more than the ones in B, yes.
> It would be better to sell most of the lands in B before forfeiting
> them, that way you get to keep their worth if not the lands themselves.

This is way way OT but: The situation in 1200-1215 is there were
several barons who held lands in Normandy and England as fiefs of John
K. of E. & Duke of N. Then the K. of France took Normandy. So they had
to pick; you can't be loyal to both, and you don't have an option to
sell. Those who stayed in England then tried to squeeze concessions
from John & came up with Magna Carta.