Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: Hello list [introduction]
From: Theodore Reed <treed@surreality.us>
To: lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org
In-Reply-To: <DATAPIPE-AHLQ5K5fqg0000fc55@epmail2.com>
References: <DATAPIPE-AHLQ5K5fqg0000fc55@epmail2.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-zK1d/gvPBSKFK5GafPxh"
Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2005 18:36:41 -0800
Message-Id: <1111804602.16411.7.camel@localhost>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@chain.digitalkingdom.org
Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@chain.digitalkingdom.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-to: lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org
Content-Length: 1253


--=-zK1d/gvPBSKFK5GafPxh
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Fri, 2005-03-25 at 17:22 +0100, lojban@shindra.com wrote:
> Cool :D Lojban seems to be really gaining ground.
>=20
> I'd that chance is very small.
>=20
> I've spent a lot of time the last few days looking at various conlangs, a=
nd Lojban is still the best I've seen. Though I don't agree with the way th=
e vocabulary is formed. It sure doesn't help me much in learning it. I'd be=
 more in favor of an interrelated vocabulary, where, for example, the word =
for 'beautiful' is made of the words for 'sight' and 'good/positive', and t=
he word meaning 'sight' is made of the words 'eye' and 'sense' or something=
 like that.
> Still, Lojban is great, seems highly professional.

Do you realize how long words would get following your formula? Also,
sounds like you'd enjoy toki pona.

--=-zK1d/gvPBSKFK5GafPxh
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBCRMq5w24JwM4aDNwRAlCNAKCf/M2HDSmcLh0DT9WVAu+wb7tCWwCgmIRL
3262vGi8RXmwjq07ULgMBy8=
=TBJ3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-zK1d/gvPBSKFK5GafPxh--