Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Thu, 28 Jul 2005 05:56:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.52)
	id 1Dy7wJ-0006Xe-57
	for lojban-beginners-real@lojban.org; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 05:56:43 -0700
Received: from wproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.184.198])
	by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52)
	id 1Dy7wE-0006XW-Kw
	for lojban-beginners@lojban.org; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 05:56:43 -0700
Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i6so422524wra
        for <lojban-beginners@lojban.org>; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 05:56:37 -0700 (PDT)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:mime-version:content-type;
        b=ohUp77lzED1Gai0s5tGD6Tvnyn18/7yiFz5v24Ij6rMdyTosRJD7tWKbLJUdnly+SMHIIbJYfnQwFqTi8kcCRp+dl8XSQ4gxgkXq1DIQHFdBgdV4qMsLvDtwPJ2Zh32njkUxFDaLuxNddN1X3bRNIYnYpdyiAJU2x7tmYfP72R0=
Received: by 10.54.57.21 with SMTP id f21mr582066wra;
        Thu, 28 Jul 2005 05:56:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.54.125.8 with HTTP; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 05:56:37 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <5ccdc75305072805563f50ab9c@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 08:56:37 -0400
From: "J. Scott Jewell" <thatskotkid@gmail.com>
To: Lojban list <lojban-beginners@lojban.org>
Subject: [lojban-beginners] zukte lenu fanva ku ma
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_1466_8069843.1122555397285"
X-Spam-Score: -2.4 (--)
X-archive-position: 1650
X-Approved-By: thatskotkid@gmail.com
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@chain.digitalkingdom.org
Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@chain.digitalkingdom.org
X-original-sender: thatskotkid@gmail.com
Precedence: bulk
Reply-to: lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org
X-list: lojban-beginners
Content-Length: 1753

------=_Part_1466_8069843.1122555397285
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

coi rodo
 I've been fiddling around with translating things into Lojban for a while=
=20
now, and I'm beginning to wonder what people generally go for when they=20
translate into Lojban. So far, my attempts have been pretty straightforward=
=20
renderings that, when translated, yield something that comes very close to=
=20
the original English (including word order, etc.) But I've seen Lojban=20
translations that barely resemble the source text at all, and magically=20
become very terse (for Lojban). So do people go for closeness to English, o=
r=20
throw their translations into the furthest reaches of Lojban? Just=20
wondering.
 fe'omi'e cuncuxnas.

------=_Part_1466_8069843.1122555397285
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

<div>coi rodo</div>
<div>&nbsp;</div>
<div>I've been fiddling around with translating things into Lojban for a wh=
ile now, and I'm beginning to wonder what people generally go for when they=
 translate into Lojban.&nbsp; So far, my attempts have been pretty straight=
forward renderings that, when translated, yield something that comes very c=
lose to the original English (including word order, etc.)&nbsp; But I've se=
en Lojban translations that barely resemble the source text at all, and mag=
ically become very terse (for Lojban).&nbsp; So do people go for closeness =
to English, or throw their translations into the furthest reaches of Lojban=
?&nbsp; Just wondering.
</div>
<div>&nbsp;</div>
<div>fe'omi'e cuncuxnas.</div>

------=_Part_1466_8069843.1122555397285--