Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Fri, 19 Aug 2005 07:44:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.52) id 1E686L-0000bM-4D for lojban-beginners-real@lojban.org; Fri, 19 Aug 2005 07:44:09 -0700 Received: from zproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.162.201]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1E686I-0000bE-SM for lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org; Fri, 19 Aug 2005 07:44:08 -0700 Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 13so422340nzp for ; Fri, 19 Aug 2005 07:44:05 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=kdcaLR289Pxm3XjPpuY5H3icIJWX98ZCAMrKcVdolD0aQm95R7lLkQHxt/aIJc2h1LBTr0MsPMSiHmvkbf4/unzxnTE8eMc3syqMOWGlDBy98kHGjD22IOrroRRcFQtu1knnp184uiXVVOCMln1pD9lH3hGZuP/lV1enCFeE1f0= Received: by 10.36.147.9 with SMTP id u9mr96979nzd; Fri, 19 Aug 2005 07:44:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.36.67.6 with HTTP; Fri, 19 Aug 2005 07:44:00 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <737b61f305081907445e8e9f41@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2005 09:44:00 -0500 From: Chris Capel To: lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: Why 16 In-Reply-To: <2d3df92a050819014471077557@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by Ecartis Content-Disposition: inline References: <2d3df92a050819014471077557@mail.gmail.com> X-Spam-Score: -2.5 (--) X-archive-position: 1783 X-Approved-By: pdf23ds@gmail.com X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@chain.digitalkingdom.org Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@chain.digitalkingdom.org X-original-sender: pdf23ds@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org X-list: lojban-beginners Content-Length: 754 On 8/19/05, HeliodoR wrote: > I'm also curious about the creators' decision on the number system: why do > we have 2^4 basic number-words? > (And I will hardly accept an answer like 'Because that covers 10' since, for > example, 1000 is also perfect for this reason. :) ) > > heliodor > > P.S.: Maybe they liked the symmetry of 2^2^2?? Lojban for Beginners suggests that the extra six are for speaking about hexadecimal numbers without using letters of the alphabet for the extra digits. That's useful for computer scientists. Chris Capel -- "What is it like to be a bat? What is it like to bat a bee? What is it like to be a bee being batted? What is it like to be a batted bee?" -- The Mind's I (Hofstadter, Dennet)