Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Sun, 21 Aug 2005 16:08:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.52) id 1E6xdG-0007Fx-TN for lojban-beginners-real@lojban.org; Sun, 21 Aug 2005 14:45:35 -0700 Received: from zproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.162.205]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1E6xdE-0007Fp-K6 for lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org; Sun, 21 Aug 2005 14:45:34 -0700 Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id x3so627326nze for ; Sun, 21 Aug 2005 14:45:31 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=jY327D+gGFSuJpBz8OBwwwAsBWLmFYNXVV+fUOtbWw9FtlccjvGa+X/+8gE0g5tUpBh7almkwH3QXkGLT0LbOKKuFMcl5NhchlJz6LugjgjFtWjZ9nK899KGTlyh9eqLrTrOenvP+gfGotC2CPDhOgAj/yOvszYoEfHgMMj4big= Received: by 10.36.221.52 with SMTP id t52mr3503601nzg; Sun, 21 Aug 2005 14:45:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.36.36.8 with HTTP; Sun, 21 Aug 2005 14:45:29 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <8f2fd4aa0508211445564ce745@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2005 14:45:29 -0700 From: Brandon Wirick To: lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org Subject: [lojban-beginners] Fwd: Re: Why 16 In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by Ecartis Content-Disposition: inline References: X-Spam-Score: -2.5 (--) X-archive-position: 1800 X-Approved-By: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@chain.digitalkingdom.org Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@chain.digitalkingdom.org X-original-sender: brandon.wirick@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org X-list: lojban-beginners Content-Length: 728 Hexadecimal is in wide use (shoot, I read hexadecimal traces at work) but unless you're reading, like, technical documents from ancient Babylon, you're not going to need more than 16 digits for any practical purpose. The cmavo-space is way bloated as it is, and since every number after 16 would just be arbtitrary cutoff points for digit cmavo, 16 is a good place to cut it off. mi'e .uirik. > Umm... we're not speaking about the same issue. :) My question was about basic names for digits, from {no} to {vai}: why do we have exactly 16 of them? I understand the usefulness of hexa digits, but for that reason we could also use a hundred or even more basic numbers, as those cover 16 as well. So what's the point (of 16)?