Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Mon, 19 Sep 2005 06:01:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.52) id 1EHLHO-00027I-PB for lojban-beginners-real@lojban.org; Mon, 19 Sep 2005 06:01:54 -0700 Received: from zproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.162.203]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1EHLHH-000273-RE for lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org; Mon, 19 Sep 2005 06:01:54 -0700 Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id s1so239450nze for ; Mon, 19 Sep 2005 06:01:42 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=smqTMW97eVuhYj2aYV2BSf6BVRJc6yp0mZUMabzo/4P8AAjAfA0Z89shuMxqsa6aeruGdmWUmHk3OPA9DnEPeOiAojl3Jd5lIezgfGlnWOIX+1gbT4ZZ08nZwtQHaEdkBVR264qH5v+2qT/lW0ZrZV1/zSmt8P2Jnwz+FIG99Cg= Received: by 10.54.152.14 with SMTP id z14mr1021264wrd; Mon, 19 Sep 2005 06:01:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.66.3 with HTTP; Mon, 19 Sep 2005 06:01:42 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <925d1756050919060164e29633@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2005 10:01:42 -0300 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Llamb=EDas?= To: lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: Genders In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by Ecartis Content-Disposition: inline References: <2d3df92a0509171015139b4fbe@mail.gmail.com> X-Spam-Score: -2.5 (--) X-archive-position: 2151 X-Approved-By: jjllambias@gmail.com X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@chain.digitalkingdom.org Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@chain.digitalkingdom.org X-original-sender: jjllambias@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org X-list: lojban-beginners Content-Length: 491 On 9/18/05, Naomi K wrote: > > I would have meant to say {la smitnau .e la smitnim} Rafsi will be the death > of me eh ;-) Yes, rafsi are a bit of a pain. Now, {smitnim} is a name word, but {smitnau} ends in a vowel so it is not a name word. It is not a lujvo either, and in fact it is not even a valid fu'ivla. This is because it fails the "slinku'i test". {lasmitnau} will be heard as a lujvo las-mit-nau ("plastic-same-man") :) mu'o mi'e xorxes