Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Mon, 19 Sep 2005 13:46:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.52) id 1EHSSZ-0000f4-6T for lojban-beginners-real@lojban.org; Mon, 19 Sep 2005 13:41:55 -0700 Received: from outmx012.isp.belgacom.be ([195.238.3.70]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA1:24) (Exim 4.52) id 1EHSSR-0000es-Sz for lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org; Mon, 19 Sep 2005 13:41:55 -0700 Received: from outmx012.isp.belgacom.be (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by outmx012.isp.belgacom.be (8.12.11/8.12.11/Skynet-OUT-2.22) with ESMTP id j8JKfcw5029627 for ; Mon, 19 Sep 2005 22:41:38 +0200 (envelope-from ) Received: from pi (156-161.240.81.adsl.skynet.be [81.240.161.156]) by outmx012.isp.belgacom.be (8.12.11/8.12.11/Skynet-OUT-2.22) with ESMTP id j8JKfak9029607 for ; Mon, 19 Sep 2005 22:41:36 +0200 (envelope-from ) Received: from wim by pi with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1EHSV0-0002du-00 for ; Mon, 19 Sep 2005 22:44:26 +0200 Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2005 22:44:26 +0200 To: lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: Lojban sign language Message-ID: <20050919204426.GA9985@pi> References: <157.592e75db.306001d0@wmconnect.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <157.592e75db.306001d0@wmconnect.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.10i From: Wim Coenen X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) X-archive-position: 2161 X-Approved-By: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@chain.digitalkingdom.org Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@chain.digitalkingdom.org X-original-sender: wim.coenen@advalvas.be Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org X-list: lojban-beginners Content-Length: 339 On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 07:58:08AM -0400, MorphemeAddict@wmconnect.com wrote: > Has there been any discussion of a sign language version of Lojban? I have > in mind a fairly strict correspondence between the two. Here's a very short discussion on it: http://www.lojban.org/tiki/tiki-index.php?page=LojbanSignLanguage mu'o mi'e .uim.