Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Tue, 27 Sep 2005 08:54:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.52) id 1EKHmY-00064R-FH for lojban-beginners-real@lojban.org; Tue, 27 Sep 2005 08:54:14 -0700 Received: from zproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.162.207]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1EKHmW-00064K-4Z for lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org; Tue, 27 Sep 2005 08:54:14 -0700 Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id s1so187533nze for ; Tue, 27 Sep 2005 08:54:11 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=sIxpwsVGiZiSGKQB1QtPoIwWqVpXkx7uku4tuQNy9rwvikcpNh6e6We99phn1iDii5BTgRLMF7H1lLJFhuaNaP/iFB/xUM91dUbQl718PfKFQT7ExPLUTNsVjwf01tfI3m//H5olmZh8f2Ts7mpFu0rB0Y2NJcQuY9Xoj+RyNQc= Received: by 10.54.13.13 with SMTP id 13mr1940282wrm; Tue, 27 Sep 2005 08:54:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.142.3 with HTTP; Tue, 27 Sep 2005 08:54:11 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2005 11:54:11 -0400 From: Matt Arnold To: lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: Lojban dictionary in other languages In-Reply-To: <925d1756050927083612acdf7@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_3778_5744391.1127836451352" References: <55.7c5bda81.3069427e@wmconnect.com> <925d17560509260537148d1d3@mail.gmail.com> <925d1756050927083612acdf7@mail.gmail.com> X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-archive-position: 2339 X-Approved-By: matt.mattarn@gmail.com X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@chain.digitalkingdom.org Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@chain.digitalkingdom.org X-original-sender: matt.mattarn@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org X-list: lojban-beginners Content-Length: 5112 ------=_Part_3778_5744391.1127836451352 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On 9/27/05, Jorge Llamb=EDas wrote: > > On 9/26/05, Matt Arnold wrote: > > This is why I believe it would be good to have multiple levels of acces= s > > permissions on jbovlaste. One would allow the proposal of new official > > lujvo, another would allow mere translation for those who don't feel > ready > > to contribute new lujvo. > > Different levels may not be necessary as long as people don't > abuse the system. Those who don't feel up to making new > lujvo can refrain from doing so even if they had the access > permissions. The system does present you with this very > intimidating message when you want to add a new word: > > << > So. You want to add a valsi to the database. > > This shouldn't be done lightly. Please check the following: > > If it is a lujvo, make sure you're using the lowest scoring form of > the lujvo. You're not going to get anywhere by using a different form, > as the database is periodically swept for noncanonical form lujvo, and > they are modified to the appropriate canonical form. (Or removed, and > all related data pointed towards the canonical version, if it already > exists.) > Also ensure that you're adding the word you actually intend to add, > and not something odd. > I've automatically checked the valsi myself, and have decided that it > is of type: lujvo. (Yes, if you try to add an official gismu or cmavo, > this will claim that they're experimental, because by the time this > goes into production, all official ones will already be entered, and > you obviously can't replace an existing one.) If this is correct, and > you are ABSOLUTELY SURE, BEYOND A SHADOW OF A DOUBT that you want to > add this word, then hit the button below: > >> > > > > As Wikipedia has demonstrated, allowing mass > > involvement creates a positive feedback loop. As people contribute more= , > no > > matter their level of ability, they feel more invested and start to > learn > > more. As they learn more, they contribute more both in quantity and > quality. > > ie sai > > mu'o mi'e xorxes > > If so, I would like a jbovlaste account please. -epkat ------=_Part_3778_5744391.1127836451352 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On 9/27/05, Jorge Llamb=EDas <jjllambias@gmail.com> wrote:
On 9/26/05, Matt Arnold <matt.= mattarn@gmail.com> wrote:
> This is why I believe it would be = good to have multiple levels of access
> permissions on jbovlaste. On= e would allow the proposal of new official
> lujvo, another would allow mere translation for those who don't fe= el ready
> to contribute new lujvo.

Different levels may not b= e necessary as long as people don't
abuse the system. Those who don't fe= el up to making new
lujvo can refrain from doing so even if they had the access
permissi= ons. The system does present you with this very
intimidating message whe= n you want to add a new word:

<<
So. You want to add a vals= i to the database.

This shouldn't be done lightly. Please check the following:

= If it is a lujvo, make sure you're using the lowest scoring form of
the = lujvo. You're not going to get anywhere by using a different form,
as th= e database is periodically swept for noncanonical form lujvo, and
they are modified to the appropriate canonical form. (Or removed, andall related data pointed towards the canonical version, if it already
= exists.)
Also ensure that you're adding the word you actually intend to = add,
and not something odd.
I've automatically checked the valsi myself, = and have decided that it
is of type: lujvo. (Yes, if you try to add an o= fficial gismu or cmavo,
this will claim that they're experimental, becau= se by the time this
goes into production, all official ones will already be entered, andyou obviously can't replace an existing one.) If this is correct, and
y= ou are ABSOLUTELY SURE, BEYOND A SHADOW OF A DOUBT that you want to
add this word, then hit the button below:
>>


> As Wi= kipedia has demonstrated, allowing mass
> involvement creates a posit= ive feedback loop. As people contribute more, no
> matter their level= of ability, they feel more invested and start to learn
> more. As they learn more, they contribute more both in quantity an= d quality.

ie sai

mu'o mi'e xorxes

= If so, I would like a jbovlaste account please.
-epkat
------=_Part_3778_5744391.1127836451352--