Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Mon, 17 Oct 2005 02:52:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.52) id 1ERReY-0004wA-Qd for lojban-beginners-real@lojban.org; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 02:51:44 -0700 Received: from xproxy.gmail.com ([66.249.82.197]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1ERRe8-0004vQ-Pr for lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 02:51:18 -0700 Received: by xproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id s17so668670wxc for ; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 02:51:07 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=IBfcdTL+iOyW1N72ZRrKaXuSJEAmdZUxwwX9nl80/h2jaYaP+zeNJVYPJTjK8VKE+AutrHl9a/UHYfNz5gVQN69kCIu/nljwJkOMkCPzcQ/WJruFzcl7oLEMlL7empSZggpu2GkULPvANz35lACVTQtyZb/o3k5ZbllVwtSZxRo= Received: by 10.70.103.15 with SMTP id a15mr2216134wxc; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 02:51:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.70.65.14 with HTTP; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 02:51:07 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 19:51:07 +1000 From: Naomi K To: lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: Minor questions In-Reply-To: <925d17560510151547r17ff86c0pa3eaa4079facbd6f@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_13496_27244995.1129542667275" References: <925d17560510151547r17ff86c0pa3eaa4079facbd6f@mail.gmail.com> X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-archive-position: 2393 X-Approved-By: alien.juxtaposition@gmail.com X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@chain.digitalkingdom.org Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@chain.digitalkingdom.org X-original-sender: alien.juxtaposition@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org X-list: lojban-beginners Content-Length: 3114 ------=_Part_13496_27244995.1129542667275 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline The predicate "x1 praises/congratulates x2 for x3" is something of a hole in the vocabulary. I haven't seen anything truly satisfactory yet. You could make up another gismu..."djuki" could fit in there, sounds like "jubilations" ;-D Just kidding. I guess gleki would be acceptable here in most cases. mi'e nei,omis On 10/16/05, Jorge Llamb=EDas wrote: > > On 10/15/05, Naomi K wrote: > > What is the lojban word for praise/congratulations? > > If what you want is to praise or congratulate someone, then you > could say ".i'e", "io", ".i'o" or some combination of them. > > The predicate "x1 praises/congratulates x2 for x3" is something > of a hole in the vocabulary. I haven't seen anything truly satisfactory > yet. Maybe something like "zarsi'a" from zanru sinma? > > > What is the word for 'Internet'? > > "la .internet." is often used. > > > There have been a few words that I have looked for that I didn't find a= n > > adequate word for. > > Yes, we don't really have a fully functional vocabulary yet. > > mu'o mi'e xorxes > > > > ------=_Part_13496_27244995.1129542667275 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline
The predicate "x1 praises/congratulates x2 for x3" is something of a hole in the vocabulary. I haven't seen anything truly satisfactory
yet.

You could make up another gismu..."djuki" could fit in there, sou= nds like "jubilations" ;-D Just kidding.

I guess gleki would be acceptable here in most cases.

mi'e nei,omis

On 10/16/05, Jorge Llamb=EDas <jjlla= mbias@gmail.com> wrote:
On 10/15/05, Naomi K <a= lien.juxtaposition@gmail.com> wrote:
> What is the lojban word= for praise/congratulations?

If what you want is to praise or congra= tulate someone, then you
could say ".i'e", "io", ".i'o" or some co= mbination of them.

The predicate "x1 praises/congratulates x2 f= or x3" is something
of a hole in the vocabulary. I haven't seen any= thing truly satisfactory
yet. Maybe something like "zarsi'a" from zanru sinma?

= > What is the word for 'Internet'?

"la .internet." is o= ften used.

> There have been a few words that I have looked for t= hat I didn't find an
> adequate word for.

Yes, we don't really have a fully functi= onal vocabulary yet.

mu'o mi'e xorxes




------=_Part_13496_27244995.1129542667275--