Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Mon, 17 Oct 2005 17:54:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.52) id 1ERfkh-0000P1-2n for lojban-beginners-real@lojban.org; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 17:54:51 -0700 Received: from 203-214-42-139.dyn.iinet.net.au ([203.214.42.139] helo=mint.digitalerection.com) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1ERfkQ-0000Ot-Pq for lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 17:54:50 -0700 Received: from [10.0.2.254] (lappy.house [10.0.2.254]) by mint.digitalerection.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDFA88DD for ; Tue, 18 Oct 2005 10:55:11 +1000 (EST) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v623) In-Reply-To: <26506d300510170419p30f70d67o@mail.gmail.com> References: <26506d300510170419p30f70d67o@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Paul Bone Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: Question of logic? Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2005 10:54:23 +1000 To: lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org X-Spam-Score: -1.6 (-) X-archive-position: 2402 X-Approved-By: boney@digitalerection.com X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@chain.digitalkingdom.org Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@chain.digitalkingdom.org X-original-sender: boney@digitalerection.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org X-list: lojban-beginners Content-Length: 364 On 17/10/2005, at 9:19 PM, Thomas White wrote: > Isn't a precision of gait (x4) redundant since 'running' is in and of > itself a gait? > Gait can also mean (at least the definition that I am familiar with) the length of your stride. if someone with longer legs typically has a larger gait. -- Paul Bone Programmer (C/C++/Java/ASM) GPG Key ID: 96FA9EED