Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Tue, 01 Nov 2005 11:39:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.54) id 1EX1yL-00049f-0w for lojban-beginners-real@lojban.org; Tue, 01 Nov 2005 11:39:05 -0800 Received: from wproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.184.203]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1EX1yJ-00049Y-6j for lojban-beginners@lojban.org; Tue, 01 Nov 2005 11:39:04 -0800 Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 71so549564wri for ; Tue, 01 Nov 2005 11:39:02 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=k/KI+1WdYavm7A5bUs9M//nNyP4OnF49VV/hg2qchLK63gheY8T9fpoe4CnCrxaDO4rdnQrPtLDk1LQ+QMNxjXhsjs61NiFpOXwiZoZLG9dW3iC0oXbUsppppRA8drzsfdWITbb7kZ/7Ntpp+O9XcEcg6TyRmDt6C2FHyGVsk14= Received: by 10.54.141.13 with SMTP id o13mr1578972wrd; Tue, 01 Nov 2005 11:39:02 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.54.66.3 with HTTP; Tue, 1 Nov 2005 11:39:02 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <925d17560511011139k7b07d6cdl6b592187421748d7@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2005 16:39:02 -0300 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Llamb=EDas?= To: lojban-beginners@lojban.org Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: Difficulties and frustrations In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by Ecartis Content-Disposition: inline References: X-Spam-Score: -2.5 (--) X-archive-position: 2449 X-Approved-By: jjllambias@gmail.com X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: jjllambias@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-beginners@lojban.org X-list: lojban-beginners Content-Length: 491 On 11/1/05, Newton, Philip wrote: > I believe those three ended up with three rafsi each because of prior usage > of each of the three possible rafsi, or something like that. > > Does someone know the story better? xorxes? camgusmis? Neither of us was around at the time, but if I had to guess, I'd say it was found that no other gismu could have those forms as rafsi and so they were assigned to them rather than leave them unassigned. mu'o mi'e xorxes