Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Tue, 01 Nov 2005 05:32:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.54) id 1EWwFY-0007Il-1A for lojban-beginners-real@lojban.org; Tue, 01 Nov 2005 05:32:28 -0800 Received: from wproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.184.199]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1EWwFT-0007Id-GY for lojban-beginners@lojban.org; Tue, 01 Nov 2005 05:32:27 -0800 Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 71so522776wri for ; Tue, 01 Nov 2005 05:32:22 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=b8ST680ylPLWLhFxiTUCIowpxdncLV+tK1W8eOyz56gTm/FVsJdGdOuBiG7qvGHVoWv48c6XXkyY3GQ8/Fgvui9LmCq79g4sJDIvG7r3OnqvuLCQuBw+Qr718FzTD/EtMeCn40TNd/jwDAD07TcDTFp0zYtfg1zKWnRzZN3IWs8= Received: by 10.54.16.59 with SMTP id 59mr1216400wrp; Tue, 01 Nov 2005 05:32:22 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.54.66.3 with HTTP; Tue, 1 Nov 2005 05:32:22 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <925d17560511010532w34cc5e58s4262b5f17a6a1697@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2005 10:32:22 -0300 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Llamb=EDas?= To: lojban-beginners@lojban.org Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: Difficulties and frustrations In-Reply-To: <26506d300511010109h106bca31q@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by Ecartis Content-Disposition: inline References: <26506d300511010109h106bca31q@mail.gmail.com> X-Spam-Score: -2.5 (--) X-archive-position: 2436 X-Approved-By: jjllambias@gmail.com X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: jjllambias@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-beginners@lojban.org X-list: lojban-beginners Content-Length: 1784 On 11/1/05, Thomas White wrote: > > .i mi do rinsa mu'i le nu do co'a tcidu le mi samclupa sezyskinoi > (sound-byte heard from Nick Nicholas's webpage) > > I you welcome because the-event you [initiative] read my > computer-type-of-loop-type-of-homepage > > Using square brackets and re-typing it to break it into his spoken > rhythm, it comes out like this: > > [.imido rinsa]*pause*[mu'ilenudoco'atcidu]*pause*[lemisamclupa]*pause*[sezyskinoi] Notice that the pauses come after each brivla, i.e. each segment has penultimate stress. In writing, this is where you would have to write spaces if you don't indicate stress by other means. > Yes, lojban is 'audiovisually isomorphic', but I had to write it down, > break it up, and re-read it to separate it into understandable > concepts. Were you really able to get all the sounds right without figuring out the words first? I think it normally works the other way: mostly we distinguish the sounds that make up a word only after we've recognized the word. > One that particularly loses me is [mu'ilenudoco'atcidu]. I think that's normal with unfamiliar words. When I heard it for the first time, I got everything except {samclupa} and {sezyskinoi}, which are not common words. I could figure out they were lujvo, but I got the rafsi wrong. The cmavo there are all pretty frequent, I had no trouble with them. > How many lojbanists have actually 'conversed', either > face-to-face or over the phone/skype? What seems more 'natural' to the > speakers? I have, both face-to-face and over the phone. In both cases we managed to converse, exhange opinions and understand each other, but not really fluently. I don't think anyone can say how truly fluent lojban will sound like yet. mu'o mi'e xorxes