Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Fri, 11 Nov 2005 08:44:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.54) id 1Eac19-0003BM-HD for lojban-beginners-real@lojban.org; Fri, 11 Nov 2005 08:44:47 -0800 Received: from wproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.184.201]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1Eac17-0003BE-O5 for lojban-beginners@lojban.org; Fri, 11 Nov 2005 08:44:47 -0800 Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 68so614523wri for ; Fri, 11 Nov 2005 08:44:45 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=AtRpQnAESUvIgAz0ckIhFSfzXnjYXv9j1nhdoyoiobLcgGO+7kH/+TQdhcvqU0do9QNEcNQknCzJJ9sGmx7sDwqKaXb+356yaZRuk14qpkawtfHqIogrq96lYuWXfVIE+bLE3rdBQ6Outy557RkQ5+92coZfDVzrtiTfG45nnaw= Received: by 10.54.152.1 with SMTP id z1mr1080612wrd; Fri, 11 Nov 2005 08:43:54 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.54.126.5 with HTTP; Fri, 11 Nov 2005 08:44:43 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <925d17560511110844w6c22660fte105ce7a53e92dee@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2005 13:44:43 -0300 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Llamb=EDas?= To: lojban-beginners@lojban.org Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: Hungarian hymn In-Reply-To: <2d3df92a0511110827p2d46979fh50f48a559906a644@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by Ecartis Content-Disposition: inline References: <2d3df92a0511110739r7991bbefp50be6a5c3147f89a@mail.gmail.com> <925d17560511110810r1b5558bete1007a9911f740c4@mail.gmail.com> <2d3df92a0511110827p2d46979fh50f48a559906a644@mail.gmail.com> X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) X-archive-position: 2545 X-Approved-By: jjllambias@gmail.com X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: jjllambias@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-beginners@lojban.org X-list: lojban-beginners Content-Length: 357 On 11/11/05, HeliodoR wrote: > > {go'i} doesn't have a rafsi, but I suppose it could. > > {selgo'i} is valid, I'm sure about that. Valid in what sense? It is a valid lujvo form, but go'i is not a rafsi officially assigned to anything. Since it is unassigned, I suppose it could be assigned to the cmavo {go'i}. mu'o mi'e xorxes