Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Fri, 18 Nov 2005 07:04:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.54) id 1Ed7n9-0002Vc-4G for lojban-beginners-real@lojban.org; Fri, 18 Nov 2005 07:04:43 -0800 Received: from miranda.org ([65.124.18.202]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with smtp (Exim 4.54) id 1Ed7n7-0002VU-T6 for lojban-beginners@lojban.org; Fri, 18 Nov 2005 07:04:42 -0800 Received: (qmail 5181 invoked by uid 534); 18 Nov 2005 08:04:39 -0700 From: jkominek@miranda.org Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2005 08:04:39 -0700 To: lojban-beginners@lojban.org Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: I've written a wikipedia article Message-ID: <20051118150439.GI20158@miranda.org> References: <2967.85.226.150.186.1132286067.squirrel@handgranat.org> <20051118041237.GH20158@miranda.org> <3926.85.226.150.186.1132297833.squirrel@handgranat.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3926.85.226.150.186.1132297833.squirrel@handgranat.org> Accept-Language: jbo, en User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i X-Spam-Score: -2.0 (--) X-archive-position: 2599 X-Approved-By: jkominek@miranda.org X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: jkominek@miranda.org Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-beginners@lojban.org X-list: lojban-beginners Content-Length: 1150 On Fri, Nov 18, 2005 at 08:10:33AM +0100, sunnan@handgranat.org wrote: > > Further, "Castlevania" is a name which doesn't really have any > > inherent meaning, so you should have been Lojbanizing it, rather than > > making a lujvo-name. > > This early in the article's life (and I've just found out that the > jbo.wikipedia does have a stub template, which I'll add) I haven't gotten > to write about the american/european releases yet, only the japanese > releases. The japanese releases (with a few exceptions) were under the > name Demon Castle Dracula - akumajou durakyura. Ah, I thought something like that might be the case, but since I couldn't read the Japanese, I was out of luck. > > (And, personally, I'm not a fan of sel+rafsi. You're gaining like, > > what, one letter? Maybe a syllable? And then we've got to know all the > > rafsi. Blah.) > > The good thing is that it helps me (and others) to learn the rafsi. It's > nicer to speak and think, as well. What do others think? It seems that you ought to be writing for understandability on Wikipedia. Not intentionally complicating things. -- Jay Kominek