Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Sun, 20 Nov 2005 00:49:16 -0800 (PST) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.54) id 1Edkst-0007Cp-Lk for lojban-beginners-real@lojban.org; Sun, 20 Nov 2005 00:49:15 -0800 Received: from rlpowell by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.54) id 1Edkst-0007Ci-B1 for lojban-beginners@lojban.org; Sun, 20 Nov 2005 00:49:15 -0800 Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2005 00:49:15 -0800 To: lojban-beginners@lojban.org Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: Up-to-date definition of Lojban Message-ID: <20051120084914.GI23316@chain.digitalkingdom.org> References: <1003614874.20051119120342@mail.ru> <20051119060745.GK23316@chain.digitalkingdom.org> <925d17560511190633j100f3c6dhfa8f70c2a540924@mail.gmail.com> <20051119203205.GS23316@chain.digitalkingdom.org> <925d17560511191259k90d9ae1j873f05b2bb835284@mail.gmail.com> <20051120000136.GU23316@chain.digitalkingdom.org> <2220.85.226.150.186.1132458327.squirrel@handgranat.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2220.85.226.150.186.1132458327.squirrel@handgranat.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i From: Robin Lee Powell X-archive-position: 2627 X-Approved-By: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-beginners@lojban.org X-list: lojban-beginners Content-Length: 1140 On Sun, Nov 20, 2005 at 04:45:27AM +0100, sunnan@handgranat.org wrote: > > On Sat, Nov 19, 2005 at 05:59:03PM -0300, Jorge Llamb?as wrote: > > Then I've repeatedly misread you in some fashion. Every time > > *I've* seen you explain xorlo, to my recollection, you've done > > it without any comment whatsoever that it was tentative and > > could be over-ruled at any time. > > When you explained xorlo on the lojban wiki (at > http://www.lojban.org/tiki/tiki-index.php?page=Xorlo) I intepreted > it as more or less final but for a technicality. The gadri proposal (which has now been accepted by a vote of 11 to 0 by the BPFK, although it is technically subject to future changes until we declare ourselves done) is quite complete, but rather full of technical jargon. Note that "although it is technically subject to future changes until we declare ourselves done". I could make it more emphatic if you like. -Robin -- http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** http://www.lojban.org/ Reason #237 To Learn Lojban: "Homonyms: Their Grate!" Proud Supporter of the Singularity Institute - http://singinst.org/