Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Wed, 07 Dec 2005 05:32:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.54)
	id 1EjzP0-0002K4-Fv
	for lojban-beginners-real@lojban.org; Wed, 07 Dec 2005 05:32:10 -0800
Received: from wproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.184.206])
	by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54)
	id 1EjzOx-0002Jn-Tu
	for lojban-beginners@lojban.org; Wed, 07 Dec 2005 05:32:10 -0800
Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 71so352431wri
        for <lojban-beginners@lojban.org>; Wed, 07 Dec 2005 05:32:06 -0800 (PST)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references;
        b=j11lf3FdyHnK6KV2Lqy6ELpk8oIYbTdxLBvdRf1ska7o/Bs9G8GX6KCdmzwvd0nQpENuz4oH7zye1hmTcZa823EGOL7lnpfjTNdO7JAqtY8OsW/ekiKkaywkrHnS99/MuXDcMD4ucUl1LbeRET3oUThy91Bf9v0Y+oTGiDx+/l8=
Received: by 10.64.203.4 with SMTP id a4mr1420876qbg;
        Wed, 07 Dec 2005 05:32:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.65.191.19 with HTTP; Wed, 7 Dec 2005 05:32:06 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <2d3df92a0512070532y63962e6k8b0bb6d7b1c3a29c@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2005 14:32:06 +0100
From: HeliodoR <exitconsole@gmail.com>
To: lojban-beginners@lojban.org
Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: questions about questions
In-Reply-To: <4395CC1C.8030305@bilkent.edu.tr>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_15630_31737780.1133962326346"
References: <26506d300511280238g762086b4o@mail.gmail.com>
	 <2d3df92a0511280645i24310fd2ga93e5b9be94cc067@mail.gmail.com>
	 <925d17560511281547y25fe8c93hcc71e1220ad4c82f@mail.gmail.com>
	 <26506d300511290026x3e37568cm@mail.gmail.com>
	 <2d3df92a0511290946w6c3c4caaqfad9f1773be4b98b@mail.gmail.com>
	 <20051129175651.GD2289@miranda.org>
	 <2d3df92a0512010619p2ca628aepe86f3be1eaff71e5@mail.gmail.com>
	 <20051201153308.GG2289@miranda.org>
	 <2d3df92a0512060513w134f8767q5236625b9964869e@mail.gmail.com>
	 <4395CC1C.8030305@bilkent.edu.tr>
X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--)
X-archive-position: 2730
X-Approved-By: exitconsole@gmail.com
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: exitconsole@gmail.com
Precedence: bulk
Reply-to: lojban-beginners@lojban.org
X-list: lojban-beginners
Content-Length: 2878

------=_Part_15630_31737780.1133962326346
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

>
> > Then that statement of LfB is wrong.
>
> Which statement are you referring to?


"Simply put, if you see a Lojban letter being used as a sumti, you take it
as referring to the last sumti whose selbri starts with that letter."
This one.

If I'm thinking of the right sentence, I can only say in our defence
> that it starts "Simply put ...". I don't think the intention was to
> imply that for every sumti there is a selbri, but you'd have to ask Nick
> for clarification on that point.


Summa summarum - cmene are different
from selbri and the method described in
LfB works with any kind of sumti.
It's clear to me now, so I don't know if we
are just arguing about nothing or does
someone still not understand what's going
on with selbri and non-selbri valsi. :)

> doi bebna
> I was agreeing with you!
> My analogy was to disagree with Jay.

That means I am not bebna in any way,
and my assertion was logically OK.
doi bebna zo'o

mi'e darves.

------=_Part_15630_31737780.1133962326346
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

<div>
<blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"PADDING-LEFT: 1ex; MARGIN: 0px 0=
px 0px 0.8ex; BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid">&gt; Then that statement of LfB =
is wrong.<br><br>Which statement are you referring to?</blockquote>
<div>&nbsp;</div>
<div>&quot;Simply put, if you see a Lojban letter being used as a <tt>sumti=
</tt>, you take it as referring to the last <tt>sumti</tt> whose <tt>selbri=
</tt> starts with that letter.&quot;</div>
<div>This one.</div><br>
<blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"PADDING-LEFT: 1ex; MARGIN: 0px 0=
px 0px 0.8ex; BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid">If I'm thinking of the right sen=
tence, I can only say in our defence<br>that it starts &quot;Simply put ...=
&quot;. I don't think the intention was to
<br>imply that for every sumti there is a selbri, but you'd have to ask Nic=
k for clarification on that point.</blockquote>
<div>&nbsp;</div>
<div>Summa summarum - cmene are different</div>
<div>from selbri and the method described in</div>
<div>LfB works with any kind of sumti.</div>
<div>It's clear to me now,&nbsp;so I don't know if we</div>
<div>are just arguing about nothing&nbsp;or does</div>
<div>someone still not understand what's going</div>
<div>on with selbri and non-selbri valsi. :)</div>
<div>&nbsp;</div>
<div>&gt; doi bebna<br>&gt; I was agreeing with you!<br>&gt; My analogy was=
 to disagree with Jay.</div>
<div>&nbsp;</div>
<div>That means I am not bebna in any way,</div>
<div>and my assertion was logically OK.</div>
<div>doi bebna zo'o</div>
<div>&nbsp;</div>
<div>mi'e darves.</div></div>

------=_Part_15630_31737780.1133962326346--