Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Tue, 13 Dec 2005 17:46:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.54) id 1EmLie-00068C-Ui for lojban-beginners-real@lojban.org; Tue, 13 Dec 2005 17:46:13 -0800 Received: from wproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.184.200]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1EmLic-000684-7o for lojban-beginners@lojban.org; Tue, 13 Dec 2005 17:46:12 -0800 Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 68so3401wri for ; Tue, 13 Dec 2005 17:46:08 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=E7Fns6mxoyxHu0/NEGOBD3PapX0VE8Em5WxnWW3phnfzXMggrIDVafJMuA+hDU+nZbAWeWUGxDQbgKGalZKZxYMNJsTeojWbaTwXbo+EE2aCr6lAL0ezCLnedMjEC8dqilvcaxQTwwrFf0kPTr6HUvuqPwBnf5MaoKSwMtsK+XQ= Received: by 10.54.67.19 with SMTP id p19mr12834wra; Tue, 13 Dec 2005 17:46:07 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.54.126.1 with HTTP; Tue, 13 Dec 2005 17:46:07 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <925d17560512131746g1a312751q7740b12a2c9f8e00@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 22:46:07 -0300 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Llamb=EDas?= To: lojban-beginners@lojban.org Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: "Once More" In-Reply-To: <20051214003119.GR3329@chain.digitalkingdom.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by Ecartis Content-Disposition: inline References: <12d58c160512120619v1ed1cdcp49af8ae1b4f3f86a@mail.gmail.com> <20051214000923.GK3329@chain.digitalkingdom.org> <925d17560512131624k30dede60n6f071da4292eeeeb@mail.gmail.com> <20051214003119.GR3329@chain.digitalkingdom.org> X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) X-archive-position: 2755 X-Approved-By: jjllambias@gmail.com X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: jjllambias@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-beginners@lojban.org X-list: lojban-beginners Content-Length: 533 On 12/13/05, Robin Lee Powell wrote: > That's "again", not "next time". Works in this case, I suppose, but > not with a command that is only intended to cover the very next > time, and that time only. "The next time you come in the house, be > careful because we had the floors done today, and they might be > slippery". Hmm... Then maybe {ca lo nu do ba fe'e nai re'o za'u re'u nerkla}, except {fe'e nai re'o} is not currently grammatical and the whole thing is too long anyway. mu'o mi'e xorxes