Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Wed, 21 Dec 2005 07:17:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Ep5iS-0007K6-Mo for lojban-beginners-real@lojban.org; Wed, 21 Dec 2005 07:17:20 -0800 Received: from zproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.162.204]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Ep5iN-0007Jz-E2 for lojban-beginners@lojban.org; Wed, 21 Dec 2005 07:17:20 -0800 Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id z31so158693nzd for ; Wed, 21 Dec 2005 07:17:12 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=f0yYnQZ0ZaieXHjB7dVRf7A1W00l33eJ4ex5WAEEWJgsHeXZ1TtiyGnzPdqhiqEH+sItd0rnFpDs/a34eecZr75GfTNaESqOzbVcBWZ6HB5mS5/DXcOgUTKovwHh45lbfYnKm6TbRD2KkOlC4cHsKS56Kp12OgF3icSDSt7AKkU= Received: by 10.64.149.14 with SMTP id w14mr543282qbd; Wed, 21 Dec 2005 07:17:11 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.65.191.19 with HTTP; Wed, 21 Dec 2005 07:17:11 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <2d3df92a0512210717q72f2d194v60d3fb2adfa811f5@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 16:17:11 +0100 From: HeliodoR To: lojban-beginners@lojban.org Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: lunra In-Reply-To: <28214402.20051221205548@mail.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_25179_1378114.1135178231522" References: <28214402.20051221205548@mail.ru> X-Spam-Score: -2.4 (--) X-archive-position: 2828 X-Approved-By: exitconsole@gmail.com X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: exitconsole@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-beginners@lojban.org X-list: lojban-beginners Content-Length: 1263 ------=_Part_25179_1378114.1135178231522 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline > > I suspect {le lunra} would be incorrect, in spite of the traditional > malglico > equations "a =3D lo; the =3D le". > Indeed it sounds bad. > The question is, how to underline the fact that {lunra} is unique? > {la terdi}, {la solri}, ... {la lunra}. mi'e darves. ------=_Part_25179_1378114.1135178231522 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline

I suspect {le lunra} would be incorrect, in spite of the traditional mal= glico
equations "a =3D lo; the =3D le".

Indeed it sounds bad.

 

The question is, how to underline the fact that {lunra} is unique?

{la terdi}, {la solri}, ... {la lunra}.
 
mi'e darves.
------=_Part_25179_1378114.1135178231522--