Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Thu, 16 Mar 2006 06:46:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1FJtkQ-00033B-Fd for lojban-beginners-real@lojban.org; Thu, 16 Mar 2006 06:46:42 -0800 Received: from zproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.162.193]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1FJtkN-000334-F0 for lojban-beginners@lojban.org; Thu, 16 Mar 2006 06:46:42 -0800 Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id l1so396585nzf for ; Thu, 16 Mar 2006 06:46:38 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=NqZDyAkyHEYs4PvAxgMBxL92vJraYc1wXbETWsVfpEF74qwnjMZZCBGt0Dvp4QqQQj+swPp04+uFtiZIX2ksUwZOz4vlu5IHnsidAQRGUdHiQcWXhBoIrdFmkrPKjAuIc6ffjYKAYqM3KmrUVksPNq8DdSPFMFZUoana9ejUv0A= Received: by 10.65.212.19 with SMTP id o19mr52433qbq; Thu, 16 Mar 2006 06:46:38 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.65.214.13 with HTTP; Thu, 16 Mar 2006 06:46:38 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <2d3df92a0603160646v4b19553av2c3aee4574ac686@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2006 15:46:38 +0100 From: HeliodoR To: lojban-beginners@lojban.org Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: My first two sentences - are they correct so far? In-Reply-To: <1225392006.20060314082022@stapelberg.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_7531_32980741.1142520398046" References: <1225392006.20060314082022@stapelberg.de> X-Spam-Score: -2.2 (--) X-archive-position: 3109 X-Approved-By: exitconsole@gmail.com X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: exitconsole@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-beginners@lojban.org X-list: lojban-beginners Content-Length: 2112 ------=_Part_7531_32980741.1142520398046 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline coi mixael. > do zanvi'e fi le mi sezyskinoi "(You're) Welcome to..." is expressed by the cmavla {fi'i} like this: fi'i mixael. .i mi'e dAni,el. ni'i rodo facki fi le samli vrici joi so'o le zildatni fo lei mi joi > so'o le barku'e That {ni'i} isn't quite okay in that position. You most surely meant {ni'o} instead. What does **{samli} mean? I bet You intended {skami} instead. Neither do I understand ?{zildatni}. {mi} doesn't require an article, it is a pro-sumti. {barku'e}... I haven't encountered such a solution yet, but this is far not the only case. It seems alright. mi'e darves. ------=_Part_7531_32980741.1142520398046 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline
coi mixael.
 
do zanvi'e fi le mi sezyskinoi
 
"(You're) Welcome to..." is expressed by the cmavla {fi= 'i} like this:
fi'i mixael. .i mi'e dAni,el.

ni'i rodo facki fi le samli vric= i joi so'o le zildatni fo lei mi joi
so'o le barku'e
 
That {ni'i} isn't quite okay in that position. You most sure= ly meant
{ni'o} instead.
What does **{samli} mean? I bet You intended {skami} instead.
Neither do I understand ?{zildatni}.
 
{mi} doesn't require an article, it is a pro-sumti.
 
{barku'e}... I haven't encountered such a solution yet, but = this is far
not the only case. It seems alright.
 
mi'e darves.
------=_Part_7531_32980741.1142520398046--