Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2006 16:04:31 +0100
From: Michael Stapelberg <michael@stapelberg.de>
Message-ID: <296255583.20060317160431@stapelberg.de>
To: HeliodoR <lojban-beginners@lojban.org>
Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: My first two sentences - are they correct so far?
In-Reply-To: <2d3df92a0603170639l228b6945yc81ee6e0aa624d3b@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1225392006.20060314082022@stapelberg.de> <2d3df92a0603160646v4b19553av2c3aee4574ac686@mail.gmail.com> <1675004324.20060316163310@stapelberg.de> <2d3df92a0603170639l228b6945yc81ee6e0aa624d3b@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-to: lojban-beginners@lojban.org
Content-Length: 1106

coi HeliodoR,

>> Mh, I thought that's the same subject I'm talking about. Still about
>> my website and still the introduction?
> Then what is the {ni'i} for? {ni'i} is "because of...".
Oops. I meant no'i.

>> {mi} doesn't require an article, it is a pro-sumti.
>> So no "fei" before? I thought "fei" means "about", "some information
>> about me"?
> You wrote {lei mi} which should simply be {mi}.
Mh well, but isn't there some necessary word which expresses that this
are some information *about* me and not *from* me (well, they are
aswell from me, but that's not the fact I want to stress)?
The definition of zildatni is:

x1=d1 is information gathered/produced by method/from source x2=d3
It acts as a gloss word.
see: http://jbovlaste.lojban.org/natlang/en/information

So how would I use this now normally? le zildatni mi?

>> co'ho,
>> mixael
> That sounds like You said goodbye to Yourself. :)
> {co'o mi'e mixael.} means "Bye, this is Michael", or - practically -
> "Bye! Michael".
Hehe, OK, Thanks, I'm not that used to newlines and points not
having the usual meaning ;-).

co'o mi'e mixael