Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Mon, 20 Mar 2006 06:51:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1FLLjW-0005Zs-BQ for lojban-beginners-real@lojban.org; Mon, 20 Mar 2006 06:51:46 -0800 Received: from zproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.162.202]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1FLLjU-0005Zj-Gv for lojban-beginners@lojban.org; Mon, 20 Mar 2006 06:51:46 -0800 Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id m22so1075150nzf for ; Mon, 20 Mar 2006 06:51:43 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=h1g1aKbKIyA5vb4x1XBVJhO0UqLsWVsR0l5e6wePTN47C+cxhZ+4P8GI+7kE7v3oxFl1H7JQSvL92T13BDqOyaJBvphlqc+3XvA0WUAVYabco3RnDh3+HN/Ho8lmvTBpyDNbD2NEh6ThCpYvGdq+ER0ZW3K0VqRxTI+gGJ57rv4= Received: by 10.65.233.5 with SMTP id k5mr420122qbr; Mon, 20 Mar 2006 06:51:39 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.65.214.13 with HTTP; Mon, 20 Mar 2006 06:51:39 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <2d3df92a0603200651m596ce7b0h2df5bc34ee463de4@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2006 15:51:39 +0100 From: HeliodoR To: lojban-beginners@lojban.org Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: quantifier + selbri In-Reply-To: <441B9086.20608@pcisys.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_9530_16498269.1142866299671" References: <441B9086.20608@pcisys.net> X-Spam-Score: -2.2 (--) X-archive-position: 3125 X-Approved-By: exitconsole@gmail.com X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: exitconsole@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-beginners@lojban.org X-list: lojban-beginners Content-Length: 1252 ------=_Part_9530_16498269.1142866299671 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline > > I've noticed that quantifiers, such as {so'a} [almost all] have rafsi > such as {soj}. If the selbri is {sruri}, would {sojselsruri} mean > "almost completely surrounding?" It is safer to insert an {y} between the pieces: {lo sojyselysruri}. It means "almost all (out of) the surrounded". mi'e darves. ------=_Part_9530_16498269.1142866299671 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline
I've noticed that quantifiers, s= uch as {so'a} [almost all] have rafsi
such as {soj}.  If the s= elbri is {sruri}, would {sojselsruri} mean
"almost completely surrounding?"
 
It is safer to insert an {y} between the pieces: {lo sojysel= ysruri}.
It means "almost all (out of) the surrounded".
 
mi'e darves.
------=_Part_9530_16498269.1142866299671--