Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Fri, 12 May 2006 09:32:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.61)	(envelope-from <nobody@digitalkingdom.org>)	id 1FeZrC-00059N-51	for lojban-beginners-real@lojban.org; Fri, 12 May 2006 08:47:10 -0700
Received: from web36410.mail.mud.yahoo.com ([209.191.85.145])	by chain.digitalkingdom.org with smtp (Exim 4.61)	(envelope-from <letsclimbhigher@yahoo.com>)	id 1FeZr8-00059B-VY	for lojban-beginners@lojban.org; Fri, 12 May 2006 08:47:09 -0700
Received: (qmail 29967 invoked by uid 60001); 12 May 2006 15:47:03 -0000
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;  s=s1024; d=yahoo.com;  h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding;  b=GxRSidu9JqB2U+/QtthyjsNTvvCPNEwW5LVzVKPYRk8MnpbzgXihcJSY+nmgz0f0ZXRNhZfVIS6BFom5nV/bxE2md/cWziIFsKhX1vvvMt479Z1uhnamCPk8tTX0UpCPlrYNdl2pYxkLAsK1LkMTppU/Rt7rEyHm4ncb67FTt2o=  ;
Message-ID: <20060512154703.29965.qmail@web36410.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
Received: from [216.127.72.7] by web36410.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 12 May 2006 08:47:03 PDT
Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 08:47:03 -0700 (PDT)
From: c k <letsclimbhigher@yahoo.com>
Subject: [lojban-beginners] rafsi and FAhA's
To: lojban-beginners@lojban.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-1148706730-1147448823=:29478"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Spam-Score: -0.8 (/)
X-archive-position: 3195
X-Approved-By: jkominek@miranda.org
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: letsclimbhigher@yahoo.com
Precedence: bulk
Reply-to: lojban-beginners@lojban.org
X-list: lojban-beginners
Content-Length: 1648

--0-1148706730-1147448823=:29478
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

coi rodo
   
  I noticed that:
   
  trixe rix ti'e  FAhA ti'a
   
  Why didn't they make the rafsi for trixe simply {ti'a}?
   
   
  Here's another one:
   
  zunle zul         FAhA zu'a
  pritu (no rafsi)  FAhA ri'u
   
  Why didn't they just let pritu have {ri'u} as a rafsi as well?  For example, with nenri both the rafsi and FAhA are {ne'i}.
   
  ki'e

		
---------------------------------
Love cheap thrills? Enjoy PC-to-Phone  calls to 30+ countries for just 2¢/min with Yahoo! Messenger with Voice.
--0-1148706730-1147448823=:29478
Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

<div>coi rodo</div>  <div>&nbsp;</div>  <div>I noticed that:</div>  <div>&nbsp;</div>  <div>trixe rix ti'e&nbsp; FAhA ti'a</div>  <div>&nbsp;</div>  <div>Why didn't they make the rafsi for trixe simply {ti'a}?</div>  <div>&nbsp;</div>  <div>&nbsp;</div>  <div>Here's another one:</div>  <div>&nbsp;</div>  <div>zunle zul&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; FAhA zu'a</div>  <div>pritu (no rafsi)&nbsp; FAhA ri'u</div>  <div>&nbsp;</div>  <div>Why didn't they just let pritu have {ri'u} as a rafsi as well?&nbsp; For example, with nenri both the rafsi and FAhA are {ne'i}.</div>  <div>&nbsp;</div>  <div>ki'e</div><p>
		<hr size=1>Love cheap thrills? Enjoy PC-to-Phone <a href="http://us.rd.yahoo.com/mail_us/taglines/postman9/*http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=39666/*http://messenger.yahoo.com/"> calls to 30+ countries</a> for just 2¢/min with Yahoo! Messenger with Voice.
--0-1148706730-1147448823=:29478--