Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Fri, 09 Jun 2006 08:05:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1FoRUv-0007nL-77 for lojban-beginners-real@lojban.org; Thu, 08 Jun 2006 13:52:57 -0700 Received: from sccrmhc13.comcast.net ([204.127.200.83]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1FoRUs-0007nD-A9 for lojban-beginners@lojban.org; Thu, 08 Jun 2006 13:52:57 -0700 Received: from bcpl.net (c-69-251-0-219.hsd1.md.comcast.net[69.251.0.219]) by comcast.net (sccrmhc13) with SMTP id <20060608205252013005rl5ue>; Thu, 8 Jun 2006 20:52:52 +0000 Message-ID: <44888DF4.7000904@bcpl.net> Date: Thu, 08 Jun 2006 16:52:04 -0400 From: Michael Turniansky User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: lojban-beginners@lojban.org Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: imperative {mi}? References: <20060510032054.GA26944@ginosko> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: -2.4 (--) You could also do it explicitly, using doi, I should think: Content-Length: 1371 doi mi .i ko smaji --Mike Turniansky, NOT giving up on lojban, just 28 days behind in e-mail (slowly plowing through) X-archive-position: 3228 X-Approved-By: jkominek@miranda.org X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: turnip@bcpl.net Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-beginners@lojban.org X-list: lojban-beginners Matt Arnold wrote: > You are the intended listener in those statements, which makes you > {do}. Therefore you can use {ko} to refer to yourself. After all, when > you're telling yourself something you're also listening to yourself. > -epkat > > On 5/9/06, Michael Hendricks wrote: > >> Is there an imperative form of {mi}? I looked through the cmavo list, >> but didn't see anything besides {ko}. If there's no cmavo, what's a >> good way to convey the same concept? I'm thinking of statements like >> the entries in a todo list where I might write "wash the car" or "pay >> the phone bill". I think of those statements being imperative to >> myself. >> >> -- >> Michael >> >> >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- >> Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux) >> >> iD8DBQFEYVwW2SxmMIGsLdwRAvjoAJ9QddUA9uMSH/+N8kSsg8oHCVn+CACfSZys >> 1EJL1GcQXYABrMAva9CGc8Y= >> =ShKU >> -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- >> >> >> > > > > >