Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Tue, 07 Nov 2006 18:30:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1GhdDK-0003uh-WE for lojban-beginners-real@lojban.org; Tue, 07 Nov 2006 18:30:55 -0800 Received: from f7.mail.ru ([194.67.57.37]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1GhdDG-0003u6-8J for lojban-beginners@lojban.org; Tue, 07 Nov 2006 18:30:54 -0800 Received: from mail by f7.mail.ru with local id 1GhdDE-000ByO-00 for lojban-beginners@lojban.org; Wed, 08 Nov 2006 05:30:48 +0300 Received: from [212.17.0.61] by win.mail.ru with HTTP; Wed, 08 Nov 2006 05:30:48 +0300 From: Yanis Batura To: lojban-beginners@lojban.org Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: baxso Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: unknown via proxy [212.17.0.61] Date: Wed, 08 Nov 2006 05:30:48 +0300 In-Reply-To: =?windows-1251?Q??= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1251 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-Id: X-Spam-Score: -2.4 (--) X-archive-position: 3670 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: ybatura@mail.ru Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-beginners@lojban.org X-list: lojban-beginners Content-Length: 1124 -----Original Message----- From: MorphemeAddict@wmconnect.com To: lojban-beginners@lojban.org Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2006 21:14:55 EST Subject: [lojban-beginners] baxso > > Is "baxso" the union of "bindo" and "meljo", or their intersection? Or > something else? > > baxso Malay-Indonesian 'Bahasa' x1 reflects > Malay-Indonesian common language/culture in aspect x2 > ab 2 (cf. meljo, bindo) > > bindo bid Indonesian x1 reflects > Indonesian culture/nationality/language in aspect x2 > ab 1 (cf. bindo, meljo, baxso) > > meljo mej Malaysian x1 reflects > Malaysian/Malay culture/nationality/language in aspect x2 > ab 1 (cf. baxso, bindo) The definition for {baxso} mentions "common", so union is more likely. Besides, {baxso} is "ab 2" while {bindo} and {meljo} are {ab 1}. We can easily discover that "ab 2" is the sum of "ab 1" and "ab 1", which is another argument for the union :) mi'e .ianis