Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Thu, 23 Nov 2006 04:47:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1GnDzH-00043m-6T for lojban-beginners-real@lojban.org; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 04:47:31 -0800 Received: from imo-d05.mx.aol.com ([205.188.157.37]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1GnDz3-00043b-Nu for lojban-beginners@lojban.org; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 04:47:30 -0800 Received: from MorphemeAddict@wmconnect.com by imo-d05.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v38_r7.6.) id d.bfd.89c6758 (58435) for ; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 07:47:12 -0500 (EST) From: MorphemeAddict@wmconnect.com Message-ID: Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 07:47:12 EST Subject: [lojban-beginners] revolution: definitions To: lojban-beginners@lojban.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part1_bfd.89c6758.3296f250_boundary" X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.2 (-) X-archive-position: 3702 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: MorphemeAddict@wmconnect.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-beginners@lojban.org X-list: lojban-beginners Content-Length: 3572 --part1_bfd.89c6758.3296f250_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In a message dated 11/23/2006 4:24:18 AM Central Standard Time, ecartis@digitalkingdom.org writes: > In this particular context two uses of the word "revolution" is central, > The Industrial Revolution and the overthrow of goverment and the > replacement of it by a new one. For the latter the concept of the > clashes of classes is central to Marx. I think the change of system of > production of goods are, if not required, very central to call something > a revolution. He definetly did not require such a event to be violent. > He had a view of history as a movement through periods where each period > where defined by 1) a certain way of organizing society and the > production of goods and 2) the conflict of economic interest between two > mayor classes. > > I don't think one can form a lujvo for that whole concept (it definely > would be to complicated), but a lujvo which is suited for such a use. > Thanks for the suggestions I've gotten so far. I'm looking at them right > now. I don't think I made this easier for any of you, but I hope I made > it easier for you to help me. > > .einar. > Another possible avenue is to create and define your terms in the article itself. This is common in natlang literature. stevo --part1_bfd.89c6758.3296f250_boundary Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable In a message dated 11/23/2006 4:24:18 AM Cen= tral Standard Time, ecartis@digitalkingdom.org writes:


In this particular context=20= two uses of the word "revolution" is central,
The Industrial Revolution and the overthrow of goverment and the
replacement of it by a new one. For the latter the concept of the
clashes of classes is central to Marx. I think the change of system of
production of goods are, if not required, very central to call something
a revolution. He definetly did not require such a event to be violent.
He had a view of history as a movement through periods where each period
where defined by 1) a certain way of organizing society and the
production of goods and 2) the conflict of economic interest between two
mayor classes.

I don't think one can form a lujvo for that whole concept (it definely
would be to complicated), but a lujvo which is suited for such a use.
Thanks for the suggestions I've gotten so far. I'm looking at them right
now. I don't think I made this easier for any of you, but I hope I made
it easier for you to help me.

.einar.


Another possible avenue is to create and define your terms in the articl= e itself.  This is common in natlang literature.

stevo --part1_bfd.89c6758.3296f250_boundary--