Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Tue, 12 Dec 2006 15:32:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1GuH6h-0003Qo-8z for lojban-beginners-real@lojban.org; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 15:32:19 -0800 Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com ([66.249.92.171]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1GuH6d-0003Qe-C8 for lojban-beginners@lojban.org; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 15:32:19 -0800 Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id m3so1761901uge for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 15:32:13 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=bWxVgYFtjfR4Q9+itZ4OcDllxoPAsbvJ91PHjxwFi3QL9rHJx1fxgmjXIx3BE+wytnU98X4EnTEpqVh3he4WIUmHcEnzR4lzKgSorsTMnFlDYqkciLBdEmXOSetPKjCu6Z2+su5AoPStk2OrF0MqHr6OqqY66JluTAJVHqNp1V8= Received: by 10.82.139.17 with SMTP id m17mr28228bud.1165966333462; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 15:32:13 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.82.116.6 with HTTP; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 15:32:13 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <925d17560612121532t47fa80eakbe27f297395f4adf@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 20:32:13 -0300 From: "=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Llamb=EDas?=" To: lojban-beginners@lojban.org Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: Does this mean what I think it means? In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <457B3AC4.5070906@mindspring.com> <189107.14551.qm@web56405.mail.re3.yahoo.com> <925d17560612101037p663ce657q7b22f62675d2ae7@mail.gmail.com> X-Spam-Score: -2.5 (--) X-archive-position: 3841 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: jjllambias@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-beginners@lojban.org X-list: lojban-beginners Content-Length: 372 On 12/12/06, Matt Arnold wrote: > Without declaring premature opposition to your proposal, I'm not convinced yet. Probably this is not the right forum for this discussion, so I replied to your post in the discussion section of: mu'o mi'e xorxes