Message-ID: <45705277.6030700@perpetuum-immobile.de>
Date: Fri, 01 Dec 2006 17:04:07 +0100
From: Timo Paulssen <timonator@perpetuum-immobile.de>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (X11/20061115)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To:  lojban-beginners@lojban.org
Subject: [lojban-beginners] minor misunderstanding of JSK
References: <f5d9f4490611301301jb12d4a1m9bb20ba240de6e6b@mail.gmail.com>	 <e6663d200611301327r3f97836p44285f8b6292e794@mail.gmail.com> <f5d9f4490612010547l3b83029eh6c1fdebee6681db7@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <f5d9f4490612010547l3b83029eh6c1fdebee6681db7@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig9B5A5A5F018B788357772E0A"
Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-to: lojban-beginners@lojban.org
Content-Length: 1988

This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156)
--------------enig9B5A5A5F018B788357772E0A
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

> This means that both
> right and wrong reviews will get mixed up without any means to comment
> and/or challenge the reviews. Anyone should have the opportunity to
> post comments on any review and the translator should have the option
> to challenge the review while explaining why is he/she doing the
> challenging. Since jboselkei in it's current form does not provide for
> this, then it mixes up right and wrong reviews indiscriminately,
> making it an unreliable source of learning material.

you can of course always look at the Value of a review, which is
calculated from the score of the user that did the review.

> I regarded such an implementation to be top priority over anything
> else, I went eagerly to see what changes were made. Boy, I was so
> disappointed. The looks and feel of the game seemed to be top priority
> rather than improving it's usefulness as a learning tool.

well, actually i was only called to action by eppcott because he had a
design that he wanted to be implemented and i did just that...
and basically i have to apologise for my dukse lazni ness, but part of
it is caused by my disliking of the uglyness of PHP.

> As of now,
> the list is the most realiable way to do what I suggested on my first
> post on this subject.

i have to agree.


--------------enig9B5A5A5F018B788357772E0A
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFFcFJ6us6NTCHpCEARAuMoAJ4tptDj33/EuQm5Obd9oo77yZENHgCeJfGq
aX6uv8/B0pIMKE1dKFPN/II=
=IxOf
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--------------enig9B5A5A5F018B788357772E0A--