Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Fri, 01 Dec 2006 11:05:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1GqDhi-0002qi-Th for lojban-beginners-real@lojban.org; Fri, 01 Dec 2006 11:05:47 -0800 Received: from wr-out-0506.google.com ([64.233.184.239]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1GqDhX-0002qL-5u for lojban-beginners@lojban.org; Fri, 01 Dec 2006 11:05:46 -0800 Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i11so1031869wra for ; Fri, 01 Dec 2006 11:05:32 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=Cik+s4sVnIB8QowCCd7UnjtG8NIEsieYXTpah9pXbN7QQQdHibhBvqqyjclbzLRptVcdtv1IDAoSTDcYVsT05BIXDX1TexKYMqVjdjyPs0ZpMQ2LMgSwEHL5YpUWfJPEgEyL5etKDdy3cSt+/GP5bjk+9gIgqGpvAmjuL4tH1Do= Received: by 10.90.83.14 with SMTP id g14mr5578238agb.1164999932093; Fri, 01 Dec 2006 11:05:32 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.90.104.9 with HTTP; Fri, 1 Dec 2006 11:05:31 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2006 15:05:31 -0400 From: Betsemes To: lojban-beginners@lojban.org Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: minor misunderstanding of JSK In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <45705277.6030700@perpetuum-immobile.de> X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) X-archive-position: 3749 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: betsemes@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-beginners@lojban.org X-list: lojban-beginners Content-Length: 243 On 12/1/06, Matt Arnold wrote: > Why must > we assume jsk will be abandoned instead of improved? Well, what I assumed is that jsk will continue to be improved and eventually it will become a reliable learning tool.