Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Fri, 29 Dec 2006 08:19:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1H0KSX-0004oU-0V for lojban-beginners-real@lojban.org; Fri, 29 Dec 2006 08:19:54 -0800 Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com ([66.249.92.171]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1H0KSG-0004nU-7k for lojban-beginners@lojban.org; Fri, 29 Dec 2006 08:19:51 -0800 Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id m3so4209796uge for ; Fri, 29 Dec 2006 08:19:31 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=KfL30rYuWlKC88Wv3NS1Ny7k8uiWDYr0h7tuXQOXjusH8u7BrxocNxeiH03jdhnRQg2n/TFu9IskBtfovXZSm9aSEXpXIm4EJO2maxXjIO0cbZmfmsSuhShF61zmjE7fn2NxuH3yz12gASDLflbuH0/jLa2Oq+AFyz0rOrTg7Ps= Received: by 10.82.136.4 with SMTP id j4mr522466bud.1167409171484; Fri, 29 Dec 2006 08:19:31 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.82.116.6 with HTTP; Fri, 29 Dec 2006 08:19:31 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <925d17560612290819r5a30288av5e3d4d4d56fdfc85@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 13:19:31 -0300 From: "=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Llamb=EDas?=" To: lojban-beginners@lojban.org Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: pu'i? In-Reply-To: <0A4A8D28-8EBF-49B7-8CB8-5E3F225F0F09@mindspring.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <0A4A8D28-8EBF-49B7-8CB8-5E3F225F0F09@mindspring.com> X-Spam-Score: -2.5 X-Spam-Score-Int: -24 X-Spam-Bar: -- X-archive-position: 3852 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: jjllambias@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-beginners@lojban.org X-list: lojban-beginners Content-Length: 312 On 12/28/06, Cortesi wrote: > > Is that not contradictory uses of pu'i? How can it be both a rafsi > and a cmavo? Many, probably most, CVV forms are both rafsi and cmavo. Sometimes the rafsi is the rafsi of the cmavo as in the case of {za'o}, but mostly it is not. mu'o mi'e xorxes