Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Sat, 30 Dec 2006 09:46:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1H0iI9-0007PJ-9z for lojban-beginners-real@lojban.org; Sat, 30 Dec 2006 09:46:46 -0800 Received: from elasmtp-scoter.atl.sa.earthlink.net ([209.86.89.67]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1H0iI3-0007P8-HV for lojban-beginners@lojban.org; Sat, 30 Dec 2006 09:46:44 -0800 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=dk20050327; d=mindspring.com; b=AeOMN+Kk0Ab74D0EfnXCARUNo+dFRbROdCWXWLloE9vxsQv8LaWcPXad2qIiEoIs; h=Received:Mime-Version:In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Message-Id:Content-Transfer-Encoding:From:Subject:Date:To:X-Mailer:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP; Received: from [68.164.83.185] (helo=[10.0.1.3]) by elasmtp-scoter.atl.sa.earthlink.net with asmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1H0iI1-0002qW-NG for lojban-beginners@lojban.org; Sat, 30 Dec 2006 12:46:37 -0500 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.3) In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: <873436C5-5C40-4634-BEE3-E58BC6007097@mindspring.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Cortesi Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: staying aloft Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2006 09:46:53 -0800 To: lojban-beginners@lojban.org X-ELNK-Trace: c82619e33d1ea3219c7f779228e2f6aeda0071232e20db4d5499bfcf886db4ec61e795f1dfdd3cb5350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c X-Originating-IP: 68.164.83.185 X-Spam-Score: -2.4 X-Spam-Score-Int: -23 X-Spam-Bar: -- X-archive-position: 3861 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: dcortesi@mindspring.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-beginners@lojban.org X-list: lojban-beginners Content-Length: 1697 On Dec 30, 2006, at 2:21 AM, la xorxes wrote: >> How long can/will we stay aloft? > > {ze'a ma} means "for how long?", so: > ze'a ma ma'a vofli ga'inai, but my innocent reading of the cmavo list did not lead me to think so: ze'a ZEhA medium time interval ze'aba ZEhA* for a while after ze'aca ZEhA* for a while during ze'apu ZEhA* for a while before This novice supposed {ze'ama} would mean "medium time interval when?" with a response of a tense cmavo. Except that, I gather, ma always requests a sumti, not a tense, in response. (Per the refgram, cu'e is the ask-for-a-tense word. But I didn't want a response of a tense anyway, I want a response of a specific length of time.) If as you say {ze'a ma} is valid, I don't get how the general idea of fill-in-this-blank questions works in that case. How would I stick a response sumti into a tense? ze'a ma ma'a vofli ze'a pano se mentu ma'a vofli [medium-duration 10-minutes we-all fly] Doesn't that say something like ten-minutes are flying using propulsion we-all? In the refgram I read about {roi} and quantified tenses, but this only seems to extend to number-of-times, (mi reroi klama == I two-times go) I don't see any way to get specific about time intervals inside the context of a tense. Tho maybe in conversation, cu'e would work: ma'a cu'e vofli? [we-all what time/space? fly] ri mentu pano [prior-sumti minutes-duration-is 10] That is not a grammatical response, which should be a tense, ui ze'i [not very dam' long!] But it does answer the question indirectly. Dave Cortesi ========= Le mi dzena pa klama La Lojbanistan and all I got was this a'unai tyrcek