Date: Sat, 26 May 2007 11:17:57 -0700
To: lojban-beginners@lojban.org
Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: BPFK Taskmaster
Message-ID: <20070526181756.GA16023@digitalkingdom.org>
References: <268181.22409.qm@web88003.mail.re2.yahoo.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <268181.22409.qm@web88003.mail.re2.yahoo.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11)
From: Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org>
Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-to: lojban-beginners@lojban.org
Content-Length: 867

On Sat, May 26, 2007 at 08:16:17AM -0700, ANDREW PIEKARSKI wrote:
> I understand.  But please note, Matt, anybody reading the page on
> standards and compliance
> http://www.lojban.org/tiki/tiki-index.php?page=Official+Baseline+Statement&bl
> would understand that at least some of the texts are reviewed for
> compliance - otherwise why have it there?  Your explanation of the
> actual situation in your e-mail below is clear...but it's not on
> the baseline page nor on the page listing the texts.  If it were,
> then I wouldn't be wasting your time on this. 

It most cetrainly *is* there and very clear:

    Following the formal declaration of the baseline, the LLG Board
    will assign a committee, probably a rump form of the byfy, with
    the task of supporting baseline compliance.

I'm not sure how much clearer the first clause there could be.

-Robin