Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Mon, 28 May 2007 21:29:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1HstKd-0005uQ-KI for lojban-beginners-real@lojban.org; Mon, 28 May 2007 21:29:16 -0700 Received: from 25.mail-out.ovh.net ([213.186.37.103]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1HstKa-0005uI-20 for lojban-beginners@lojban.org; Mon, 28 May 2007 21:29:15 -0700 Received: (qmail 29258 invoked by uid 503); 29 May 2007 04:26:29 -0000 Received: (QMFILT: 1.0); 29 May 2007 04:26:29 -0000 Received: from gw2.ovh.net (HELO mail238.ha.ovh.net) (213.251.189.202) by 25.mail-out.ovh.net with SMTP; 29 May 2007 04:26:29 -0000 Received: from b0.ovh.net (HELO queue-out) (213.186.33.50) by b0.ovh.net with SMTP; 29 May 2007 04:29:09 -0000 Received: from 106.105-225-89.dsl.completel.net (106.105-225-89.dsl.completel.net [89.225.105.106]) by ssl0.ovh.net (IMP) with HTTP for ; Tue, 29 May 2007 06:29:09 +0200 Message-ID: <1180412949.465bac15397e2@ssl0.ovh.net> Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 06:29:09 +0200 From: m.kornig@sondal.net To: lojban-beginners@lojban.org Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: dicussions about basic vocabulary MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 3.2.6 X-Originating-IP: 89.225.105.106 X-Spam-Score: 0.6 X-Spam-Score-Int: 6 X-Spam-Bar: / X-archive-position: 4765 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: m.kornig@sondal.net Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-beginners@lojban.org X-list: lojban-beginners Content-Length: 2033 Selon Vid Sintef : > But by { pendo = Freund(in) } people may not notice even the fact that such > thing as "a place structure" exists in Lojban, first of all. It's blotting > out the vital principle of Lojban. I would claim that "knowing the principles" of Lojban (or any other language for that matter) is not important for a beginner. Beginners usually don't care about such things. They just want to learn to speak at a very basic level. They don't need to know principles. In fact, I believe knowing (or learning) principles is not helping much. For most learners it's juch a waste of time... Vid, I know that this may sound like a mere provocation to you and others who appreciate grammars, structure and principles of languages and who are used to learning languages that way. But I strongly believe most (ordinary) people just don't learn languages that way... May I suggest, that we interrupt this discussion for now until my e-learning tool is up and running? Maybe you will understand my point then. And if my tool turns out to be not any good I will distroy it knowing that I've learned something important about how you (don't) learn languages. That's a promise. Okay? For the time being I would appreciate your comments and your help with this project very much. Can I count on you? > I, too, had been naively thinking it should be ok if I treat gismu as "noun" > or "verb" or "adjective" in accordance with their English translations; but > I regret, because that didn't realy help improve my understanding of Lojban. > It might also become a stumbling block to one's future progress if he > falsely gets used to that idea at an early stage of learning. My suggestion > is that every Lojban learner must be aware, from the beginning, of the fact > that gismu is not "noun" nor "verb" nor "adjective"; it's "gismu". In fact, I plan not to use grammar words at all. I won't try to explain the term "gismu" and will not use words like "noun", "adjective", "article", "verb", etc. Martin