Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: the hills of Andilly which are delightful - abstractors, be
Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 08:55:48 -0400
Message-Id: <1189A858F8918F43BE3F9C7603C73FB4031E7DBA@0456-its-exmp01.us.saic.com>
In-Reply-To: <4672826D.7010704@perpetuum-immobile.de>
Thread-Topic: [lojban-beginners] Re: the hills of Andilly which are delightful - abstractors, be
Thread-Index: AcevS0ljCRht8XxrSeeE9LgWg7fNOwAAP3HQ
From: "Turniansky, Michael [UNK]" <MICHAEL.A.TURNIANSKY@saic.com>
To: <lojban-beginners@lojban.org>
Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-to: lojban-beginners@lojban.org
Content-Length: 619

Timo:

> David Cortesi wrote:
> > It was {sedu'u}, the-fact-of, I didn't know. This is a useful
template:
> > "I said that x-is-y" ==> {mi pu cusku sedu'u <bridi>}

> you lack a gadri before sedu'u in that template. abstractors like nu,
> du'u, zu'o (see below) and so on always turn something into a brivla,
> which you need to turn into a sumti first, or else you'll mash them
> together (with cusku in this case) to a tanru!


  That was my fault, not David's.  Thanks for catching it.  (I scan
stuff into jbofi'e before sending it out, in order to double-check, but
I missed that one).
 
              --gejyspa