Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Tue, 19 Jun 2007 06:52:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.63)	(envelope-from <nobody@digitalkingdom.org>)	id 1I0e8T-0005UJ-T9	for lojban-beginners-real@lojban.org; Tue, 19 Jun 2007 06:52:46 -0700
Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com ([209.85.146.179])	by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.63)	(envelope-from <adamgarrigus@gmail.com>)	id 1I0e8Q-0005UB-P6	for lojban-beginners@lojban.org; Tue, 19 Jun 2007 06:52:45 -0700
Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id m16so2438474waf        for <lojban-beginners@lojban.org>; Tue, 19 Jun 2007 06:52:38 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed;        d=gmail.com; s=beta;        h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references:x-google-sender-auth;        b=B8NP65KqZRSjJXukyPDqWhgZuyvaQjuk7wOhi5CYnZ29NilYAP0S9+shc2bOnw4K3tJQNVtbnFvdSC+/FWJ5/KWQ3erRMDDnf2e4RIwkOrrwX67WUQndTjiZ91Ob5jJm8h+gMcvh7hSHj4v5pt8wLuRBsbrSsBjZZNf0Aju5A54=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;        d=gmail.com; s=beta;        h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references:x-google-sender-auth;        b=Z0RhLQ2yJKm3IHMpLvmhwWxE93L6eEVNSWHMlcIvONay9L9LwgM88Wg+8AtNPelpOglRL+VmgxXHwRxetn7wjdjfwqGW9Py5uhqQVqntWqPSgqmS7I40xl9UEQs46M+GDcc/cZAEFCP9WZXgygxJ9rMl8OhgKpeddZQAT9t6Xic=
Received: by 10.114.196.1 with SMTP id t1mr7429947waf.1182261158378;        Tue, 19 Jun 2007 06:52:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.114.113.4 with HTTP; Tue, 19 Jun 2007 06:52:38 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <12d58c160706190652v4b96be92w2eb60ac1a59a41ee@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 09:52:38 -0400
From: "komfo,amonan" <komfoamonan@gmail.com>
To: lojban-beginners@lojban.org
Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: la
In-Reply-To: <4677D46E.3030604@online.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_69657_9807167.1182261158329"
References: <1189A858F8918F43BE3F9C7603C73FB4031E7DD5@0456-its-exmp01.us.saic.com>	 <4677D46E.3030604@online.de>
X-Google-Sender-Auth: d0539015a41f9334
X-Spam-Score: 0.0
X-Spam-Score-Int: 0
X-Spam-Bar: /
X-archive-position: 5056
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: komfoamonan@gmail.com
Precedence: bulk
Reply-to: lojban-beginners@lojban.org
X-list: lojban-beginners
Content-Length: 2150

------=_Part_69657_9807167.1182261158329
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

On 6/19/07, Klaus Schmirler <KSchmir@online.de> wrote:
>
> Turniansky, Michael [UNK] schrieb:
> >  ... That's why la ja.jak.rusol is not
> > allowed, because "ja" isn't a cmevla
>
> Lurking, wondering, now asking:
>
> Is it necessary to lojbanize "name clusters" bit by bit? Wouldn't
> jajak. rusol. be acceptable?


Yes, as is {janjak.}

On a related note, what should be done with that French dictionary?
> Blarus? Lyrus?


Under the current system, I would go with {lyrus.}, {liarus.}, or {luarus.}.
Under the proposed system, with a pause preceding names in all situations,
{.larus.} would be acceptable.
mu'o mi'e komfo,amonan

------=_Part_69657_9807167.1182261158329
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

On 6/19/07, <b class="gmail_sendername">Klaus Schmirler</b> &lt;<a href="mailto:KSchmir@online.de">KSchmir@online.de</a>&gt; wrote:<div><span class="gmail_quote"></span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
Turniansky, Michael [UNK] schrieb:<br>&gt;&nbsp;&nbsp;... That&#39;s why la ja.jak.rusol is not<br>&gt; allowed, because &quot;ja&quot; isn&#39;t a cmevla<br><br>Lurking, wondering, now asking:<br><br>Is it necessary to lojbanize &quot;name clusters&quot; bit by bit? Wouldn&#39;t
<br>jajak. rusol. be acceptable?</blockquote><div><br>Yes, as is {janjak.} <br></div><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">On a related note, what should be done with that French dictionary?
<br>Blarus? Lyrus?</blockquote><div><br>Under the current system, I would go with {lyrus.}, {liarus.}, or {luarus.}. Under the proposed system, with a pause preceding names in all situations, {.larus.} would be acceptable.
<br>mu&#39;o mi&#39;e komfo,amonan<br></div><br><div><br>&nbsp;</div><br></div><br>

------=_Part_69657_9807167.1182261158329--