Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Thu, 25 Oct 2007 12:37:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1Il8Wd-0000xY-MB for lojban-beginners-real@lojban.org; Thu, 25 Oct 2007 12:37:52 -0700 Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com ([209.85.146.180]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1Il8WZ-0000xM-6a for lojban-beginners@lojban.org; Thu, 25 Oct 2007 12:37:51 -0700 Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id m16so739139waf for ; Thu, 25 Oct 2007 12:37:44 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=wQ6dPfwpbPimczXlr1FHe4fp0KG9XluPA1mQ1XJ1D/U=; b=ufpLh6MEdsCgnIEJWhcNlPQtszwuHNptAUJfhediTuW+y20womsnW8oHxY8OuPnDv5NwoPFYJm6H52e2k5d9gPkvpKRZ6sRAXDyEPlgNo5gQ5H6B0RclKXxEI2CLjYkfSsyBH5+eksWYEhCrpPyjk/B2/cif8n6VqnRXaUMnM+Y= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=Z7rYHCuOKSaI+b/ThDhMRs4atVWxbrb+AS86kEdSR0bUz3zsIsjeGfrelxifL37m2u6zJiQJTMsD4uK3/fXixJ3mBZE2EEdHS72xa9oWltuJPwhjSUdDbi9iXrEZ0wSGC3+HP4GsfM90g/fKuSDaG0hbjs8/4P2X/XRAqvYBFSc= Received: by 10.114.190.6 with SMTP id n6mr2481680waf.1193341064258; Thu, 25 Oct 2007 12:37:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.115.74.16 with HTTP; Thu, 25 Oct 2007 12:37:44 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <8905c87a0710251237t7fd6368ckd88911991243ac8a@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 12:37:44 -0700 From: "Judson Lester" To: lojban-beginners@lojban.org Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: lo mlatu lo gerku ma kau frica In-Reply-To: <8905c87a0710251218r2e8a9d22g3f549ee8bf8d8a43@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_4807_2022717.1193341064245" References: <471FD45F.2090507@perpetuum-immobile.de> <97f5058c0710241650n5a51b4f0i80fc18e9db3d2b35@mail.gmail.com> <8905c87a0710241806m5460ebffvd940a2a8b3ec2d1a@mail.gmail.com> <97f5058c0710241818k6428163fnc2dd327ba4a97791@mail.gmail.com> <925d17560710250556l7fae1681p7836a6b1237ec065@mail.gmail.com> <8905c87a0710251218r2e8a9d22g3f549ee8bf8d8a43@mail.gmail.com> X-Spam-Score: 0.0 X-Spam-Score-Int: 0 X-Spam-Bar: / X-archive-position: 5634 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: nyarly@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-beginners@lojban.org X-list: lojban-beginners Content-Length: 1618 ------=_Part_4807_2022717.1193341064245 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline On 10/25/07, Judson Lester wrote: > > > .ie ki'e do danri lo mi skudji .a'onairu'e > > I understand now why di'u is better than go'i (or rather: why one is right > and the other wrong) - why isn't la'edi'u better though? > si sa .i .ie ki'e do drani tu'a mi skudji .a'onairu'e *Now* I think I understand now why di'u is better than go'i (or rather: why one is right and the other wrong) - why isn't la'edi'u better though? ------=_Part_4807_2022717.1193341064245 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline

On 10/25/07, Judson Lester <nyarly@gmail.com> wrote:

.ie ki'e do danri lo mi skudji .a'onairu'e

I understand now why di'u is better than go'i (or rather: why one is right and the other wrong) - why isn't la'edi'u better though? 

si sa .i

.ie ki'e do drani tu'a mi skudji .a'onairu'e

*Now* I think I understand now why di'u is better than go'i (or rather: why one is right and the other wrong) - why isn't la'edi'u better though?
------=_Part_4807_2022717.1193341064245--