Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Sun, 28 Oct 2007 11:12:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1ImCcE-0001Ei-6E for lojban-beginners-real@lojban.org; Sun, 28 Oct 2007 11:12:02 -0700 Received: from sparkle.rodents.montreal.qc.ca ([216.46.5.7] ident=8tzeJeDMLVpS0AHy3hA1k1TWVeSSpR6VEQacRYFsgxT) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1ImCcA-0001E8-QM for lojban-beginners@lojban.org; Sun, 28 Oct 2007 11:12:01 -0700 Received: (from mouse@localhost) by Sparkle.Rodents.Montreal.QC.CA (8.8.8/8.8.8) id OAA24625; Sun, 28 Oct 2007 14:11:51 -0400 (EDT) From: der Mouse Message-Id: <200710281811.OAA24625@Sparkle.Rodents.Montreal.QC.CA> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Erik-Conspiracy: There is no Conspiracy - and if there were I wouldn't be part of it anyway. X-Message-Flag: Microsoft: the company who gave us the botnet zombies. Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2007 13:53:43 -0400 (EDT) To: lojban-beginners@lojban.org Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: geodesic dome In-Reply-To: References: X-Spam-Score: 0.3 X-Spam-Score-Int: 3 X-Spam-Bar: / X-archive-position: 5724 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: mouse@Rodents.Montreal.QC.CA Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-beginners@lojban.org X-list: lojban-beginners Content-Length: 2219 > I'm quickly discovering that the Lojban community is a group of > people that don't take the language more seriously really than as a > intellectual game which my level is apparently zero in and therefore > I don't have a right to discuss the weaknesses and problems of the > game that could be worked on. That this is your perception (which I am entirely ready to believe) does not mean that it is fact (which I don't believe). I'm not much of a lojbanist myself. But, while I've seen weaknesses in lojban, I haven't decided that I know better than the people who have been working on lojban for decades how fixable they are. Every language has weaknesses, lojban included - weaknesses of varying degrees of fixability. But fixing any problem has costs. Until I (feel I) understand the language as it is, which I am a long way from, I won't be (resp. feel I am) ready to try to determine the costs of fixing problems and decide what's a good tradeoff - perhaps fixing a problem would involve losing some other property that is even more valuable, and, until I have my head around the language, I won't be competent to make those decisions. This doesn't stop me from seeing weaknesses. I think I've even mentioned a few of them. But I've taken the experts' word for it when they speak to the subject; they are the experts, and I know better than to second-guess them on their field of (relative) expertise. > My present inability to speak Lojban doesn't make it impossible for > me to notice weaknesses as this exercise with a geodesic dome has > demonstrated. No. But it does mean that you probably are not competent to fix them, nor even to pronounce on how fixable they are. And, on a completely different note, it would help if you could learn and apply proper email quoting etiquiette. Every time you top-post and fail to trim context (which combination seems to be your usual modus operandi) you push me closer to mentally killfiling you as someone who can't be bothered to put even minimal effort into producing readable email. /~\ The ASCII der Mouse \ / Ribbon Campaign X Against HTML mouse@rodents.montreal.qc.ca / \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B