Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Sun, 30 Dec 2007 14:47:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1J96wd-0003B5-Fu for lojban-beginners-real@lojban.org; Sun, 30 Dec 2007 14:47:47 -0800 Received: from squid17.laughingsquid.net ([72.32.93.144]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1J96wX-0003Am-Ir for lojban-beginners@lojban.org; Sun, 30 Dec 2007 14:47:47 -0800 Received: (qmail 2958 invoked by uid 48); 30 Dec 2007 14:47:32 -0800 Received: from c-24-63-92-33.hsd1.ma.comcast.net (c-24-63-92-33.hsd1.ma.comcast.net [24.63.92.33]) by webmail.ixkey.info (Horde MIME library) with HTTP; Sun, 30 Dec 2007 14:47:32 -0800 Message-ID: <20071230144732.4i70hzzqosk4ogcs@webmail.ixkey.info> Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2007 14:47:32 -0800 From: mungojelly@ixkey.info To: lojban-beginners@lojban.org Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: confusing gismus References: <2f91285f0712300908l379651c5o91cde87e8b81960e@mail.gmail.com> <20071230110938.lvwyvup5kwsc04g4@webmail.ixkey.info> <925d17560712301407j353e0f17j264267c967937b91@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <925d17560712301407j353e0f17j264267c967937b91@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; DelSp="Yes"; format="flowed" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by Ecartis User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) H3 (4.1.4) X-Spam-Score: 0.0 X-Spam-Score-Int: 0 X-Spam-Bar: / X-archive-position: 91 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: mungojelly@ixkey.info Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-beginners@lojban.org X-list: lojban-beginners Content-Length: 378 Quoting Jorge Llambías : > One distinction is that skapi is a kind of material ("from x2") > while pilka is a body-part ("of x2"). So pilka only becomes skapi > once it has been removed from the animal it belonged to. > Somewhat analogous to the distinction between "meat" and > "flesh" in English. So human skin is "rempi'a" then? mu'o mi'e. bret.