Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Fri, 27 Feb 2009 03:56:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ld1Jz-0007yP-Ml for lojban-beginners-real@lojban.org; Fri, 27 Feb 2009 03:56:04 -0800 Received: from imr-d02.mx.aol.com ([205.188.157.40]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ld1Jw-0007ws-PM for lojban-beginners@lojban.org; Fri, 27 Feb 2009 03:56:03 -0800 Received: from MorphemeAddict@wmconnect.com by imr-d02.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v39.1.) id d.ce1.44f4cbc7 (14502) for ; Fri, 27 Feb 2009 06:55:43 -0500 (EST) From: MorphemeAddict@wmconnect.com Message-ID: Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 06:55:42 EST Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: pro-selbri ? To: lojban-beginners@lojban.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part1_ce1.44f4cbc7.36d92ebe_boundary" X-Spam-Flag:NO X-Spam-Score: 0.8 X-Spam-Score-Int: 8 X-Spam-Bar: / X-archive-position: 1362 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: MorphemeAddict@wmconnect.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-beginners@lojban.org X-list: lojban-beginners Content-Length: 1837 --part1_ce1.44f4cbc7.36d92ebe_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In a message dated 27.02.2009 4:41:52 Eastern Standard Time, selckiku@gmail.com writes: > > mu'o doi cilre be fi zo go'i za'a .e zo cei .a'o mi'e selkik > (over, O learner about "go'i", i see, and hopefully "cei", i'm selkik) > Why is "mu'o" not said last? The whole community does this. It seems to me that as soon as "mu'o" is used, the speaker should be waiting for a response, rather than continuing to speak, which negates the whole point of "mu'o". mi'e stevon mu'o --part1_ce1.44f4cbc7.36d92ebe_boundary Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable In a message=20= dated 27.02.2009 4:41:52 Eastern Standard Time, selckiku@gmail.com writes:



mu'o doi cilre be fi zo go'i za'a .e zo cei .a'o mi'e selkik
(over, O learner about "go'i", i see, and hopefully "cei", i'm selkik)


Why is "mu'o" not said last?  The whole community does this.  = It seems to me that as soon as "mu'o" is used, the speaker should be waiting= for a response, rather than continuing to speak, which negates the whole po= int of "mu'o".

mi'e stevon
mu'o --part1_ce1.44f4cbc7.36d92ebe_boundary--