Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Thu, 14 May 2009 05:50:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1M4aO0-0007QQ-8d for lojban-beginners-real@lojban.org; Thu, 14 May 2009 05:50:08 -0700 Received: from yw-out-1718.google.com ([74.125.46.157]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1M4aNw-0007Q5-My for lojban-beginners@lojban.org; Thu, 14 May 2009 05:50:08 -0700 Received: by yw-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 5so3071576ywm.46 for ; Thu, 14 May 2009 05:50:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=AbRzK5V+Tu5YoGLMTapc167ROgNZQIJVgmvJfA/pqYI=; b=uLcmZTg3ivUPa5zPepsOuPz2gAL4VC3T0nDMpFTYBtcyw0HeRmk5ejpNNz79O0ArtH fohNFOue7RgjeXPDlDg9xhCUGvYRXqNr9x53ao+fAVSp8R3PFS61DqnEri4g6A7lfTuR +mXC0Wn09NTD9QhVewmF9uNpha89PDxbmlGKw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=Py0T1NCkZRU1tkQKPqoaVo5jxnjtHyMMc40yazNx8DHgNH3yN6VwwF0xoJekMiInOT 0kEgrv5LdXAMv8s+6fKk7UrsMA9RhDcRy52hppeiTUBw72wfUC+j1D7ATXqEUK5/bX7t GoWU4GWnTwLF5IeWzAzld6mOoUP/lnNOYvMoo= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.100.10.15 with SMTP id 15mr3093807anj.8.1242305402736; Thu, 14 May 2009 05:50:02 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <200905140806.11369.phma@phma.optus.nu> References: <4de8c3930905131658t2a349af9w17ba5be09144571f@mail.gmail.com> <20090514003943.GA29600@sdf.lonestar.org> <200905140806.11369.phma@phma.optus.nu> Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 09:50:02 -0300 Message-ID: <925d17560905140550j102524c4pd5677798bc46edb6@mail.gmail.com> Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: CCVCCCCV From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Llamb=EDas?= To: lojban-beginners@lojban.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-archive-position: 1658 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: jjllambias@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-beginners@lojban.org X-list: lojban-beginners Content-Length: 1353 On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 9:06 AM, Pierre Abbat wrote: >> de'i li 14 pi'e 05 pi'e 2009 la'o fy. tijlan .fy. cusku zoi skamyxatra. >> >> > Is a fu'ivla of form "CCVCCCCV" valid? Yes, provided the initial CC is a valid initial and the CCCC is a valid cluster. >> > I couldn't find it on the "nice fu'ivla forms" list. The definition of "nice" given in that page is: "nice fu'ivla forms are those forms that don't contain VVV, CC/C or CCCC groups, which can never appear in lujvo, and start with one or two consonants." That's not exactly how I would define "nice" forms today, but the four consonant cluster is the reason that form is not on the list. (Today I would define "nice" as any fu'ivla that does not contain syllabic consonants.) > I'm not sure of xorxes's rules, but I think he would additionally require > that the last CCC belong to a restricted set. I would require that the last CCC be a valid initial, or that the first CC of the CCCC cluster be a valid syllable. In other words, "CCVCCCCV" has to consist of valid syllables, either two syllables CCVC-CCCV or three CCV-CC-CCV. > So he would allow "slabjgle" > but not "tramtsto", whereas I would allow them both. Right, because I don't take "tsto" to be a valid syllable (nor "mt", nor "tramt"). "tratmsto" would be acceptable: tra-tm-sto. mu'o mi'e xorxes