Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Fri, 12 Jun 2009 15:03:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1MFEqY-00060y-Q1 for lojban-beginners-real@lojban.org; Fri, 12 Jun 2009 15:03:41 -0700 Received: from ol.freeshell.org ([192.94.73.20] helo=sdf.lonestar.org) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1MFEqG-0005zX-Vy for lojban-beginners@lojban.org; Fri, 12 Jun 2009 15:03:37 -0700 Received: from sdf.lonestar.org (IDENT:jwodder@iceland.freeshell.org [192.94.73.5]) by sdf.lonestar.org (8.14.3/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n5CM37k4001467 for ; Fri, 12 Jun 2009 22:03:07 GMT Received: (from jwodder@localhost) by sdf.lonestar.org (8.14.3/8.12.8/Submit) id n5CM36YO011467 for lojban-beginners@lojban.org; Fri, 12 Jun 2009 22:03:06 GMT Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 22:03:06 +0000 From: Minimiscience To: lojban-beginners@lojban.org Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: another oddity pe la jbofi'e Message-ID: <20090612220305.GA28421@sdf.lonestar.org> Mail-Followup-To: lojban-beginners@lojban.org References: <4de8c3930906111536u2b04041eqd107c1e6ec0df279@mail.gmail.com> <20090611232213.GA3369@sdf.lonestar.org> <925d17560906111829p3812c6d5j1a4b21c55e249fb8@mail.gmail.com> <4de8c3930906120119p89d78d3se80270d7dd30f1e2@mail.gmail.com> <925d17560906120533m36e8e51ema7a1851da6053e78@mail.gmail.com> <4de8c3930906121443jefa57baocb7d0997687f8cd9@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4de8c3930906121443jefa57baocb7d0997687f8cd9@mail.gmail.com> Organization: SDF Public Access UNIX System User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-01-05) X-archive-position: 1836 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: minimiscience@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-beginners@lojban.org X-list: lojban-beginners Content-Length: 574 de'i li 12 pi'e 06 pi'e 2009 la'o fy. tijlan .fy. cusku zoi skamyxatra. > It appears both "da do'e do'e broda" and "da do'e do'e cu broda" have > syntax errors. Why? .skamyxatra That appears to be Yet Another jbofi'e Bug (someone should be writing these down). The official parser accepts both of those without complaint, along with plain "{da do'e broda}," though "{da cu do'e do'e broda}" is patently against the grammar (tags can't come between "{cu}" and the {selbri}). mu'omi'e .kamymecraijun. -- loi jetnu ka'e bartu .ije ku'i loi jitfa cu nenri lo stedu be do