Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Wed, 24 Jun 2009 18:17:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1MJdah-0008Sv-DS for lojban-beginners-real@lojban.org; Wed, 24 Jun 2009 18:17:27 -0700 Received: from mail-ew0-f211.google.com ([209.85.219.211]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1MJdad-0008Qx-Vv for lojban-beginners@lojban.org; Wed, 24 Jun 2009 18:17:27 -0700 Received: by ewy7 with SMTP id 7so1640663ewy.34 for ; Wed, 24 Jun 2009 18:17:17 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to :references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=xjpZvmogMRRrmDhz0LySH1YIHUtnM+vYeAdc0TofBos=; b=XWmKRNyONzIO04RjH1q8mA/BFAO+4Q12JchPy7WtlWTJYDcDF5gbUqAs3XwbJEIfs9 7WXmBcbrIo5/8tY2s1r0X1CVVEk06krDClhIOD0eQP7ng4WUt8qO1NKYA+kywJFbLOrW IALHaiHLIs+n1ImfRrGsl6bWoTaEgrS6X3OjE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=knwhGA/le1QCkYeZvSC4BCr2wprghltTqSAxnpWzQOdm37Aw0r+6K360niB8aJaygs P2mR8cUCfNslgvD1AtF0McJrLjsU7IDTkwRodWWXGpvER2eldJe9NxUZD9UJIkcOqMWb Pk9LjsK766N5I3gPXwzaEbs9VOsbimCCdZGrE= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.3.65 with SMTP id 43mr574009weg.149.1245892637054; Wed, 24 Jun 2009 18:17:17 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <5715b9300906230842q53f93b50k5ea208d5e7ec7dc@mail.gmail.com> References: <5715b9300906230842q53f93b50k5ea208d5e7ec7dc@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 21:17:17 -0400 X-Google-Sender-Auth: e92f4e8cce6205fb Message-ID: <12d58c160906241817va34c31ch69a2cb1c3385705f@mail.gmail.com> Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: stupid question From: "komfo,amonan" To: lojban-beginners@lojban.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e65681b00f5776046d21fc02 X-archive-position: 1883 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: komfoamonan@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-beginners@lojban.org X-list: lojban-beginners Content-Length: 1887 --0016e65681b00f5776046d21fc02 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 11:42 AM, Luke Bergen wrote: > So here's an off-the-wall question. Would the three following sentences > mean the same thing (emphasis and all)? > > klama > zo'e klama zo'e zo'e zo'e zo'e > lo klama cu klama lo se klama lo te klama lo ve klama lo xe klama I'd say they all mean the same thing. The first two are technically equivalent, although I imagine most hearers would seek an agenda behind all those {zo'e}. Also, of course, the first could be interpreted as an observative, while the others could not. The third, I think, is tautological. mu'o mi'e komfo,amonan --0016e65681b00f5776046d21fc02 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 11:42 AM, Luke Bergen <lukeabergen@gmail.com> wrot= e:

So here's an off-the-wall question.=C2=A0 Would the three following sen= tences mean the same thing (emphasis and all)?

klama
zo'e kla= ma zo'e zo'e zo'e zo'e
lo klama cu klama lo se klama lo = te klama lo ve klama lo xe klama

I'd say they all mean the same thing. The first two are techni= cally equivalent, although I imagine most hearers would seek an agenda behi= nd all those {zo'e}. Also, of course, the first could be interpreted as= an observative, while the others could not. The third, I think, is tautolo= gical.

mu'o mi'e komfo,amonan

--0016e65681b00f5776046d21fc02--