Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Tue, 29 Sep 2009 07:36:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Msdox-0008Cg-Q7 for lojban-beginners-real@lojban.org; Tue, 29 Sep 2009 07:36:52 -0700 Received: from mail-px0-f185.google.com ([209.85.216.185]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Msdom-00089q-DV for lojban-beginners@lojban.org; Tue, 29 Sep 2009 07:36:51 -0700 Received: by pxi15 with SMTP id 15so5668120pxi.25 for ; Tue, 29 Sep 2009 07:36:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=ZZeYyCRmP1j85/E0ElcISGqu4nVfDVTw+NUs6dmgK+k=; b=JwEDAdXtjnOSOw1/DjbRaGcmyDa55FYXlm/6u2EqSIfAPJm04CkdTLAFBGIjYfoTyX mUbGzmpFbUY3o+zsq8G1JyRi7JzM1L4dBfjb3qm2DEsZlM0HVLzPBrgZpNVDrFao/zM6 LfuDk4GaOljI6OH89uostYExEpJtEzeeHRsuY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=wLuHiFmWyI9HhRYJjMQ4XploLCLQ688Mu0KgTOzI4lCp+gbRbI8bwPgxOR6ol4kM6e 85UomwGCJmVqH2CXYiry33gPFYpyHK4x7Y7Q1yjv1AoWB62DnCmUk9vQfIVHghWa6Hyc eDMIV4trTLWnRVnpHA/ZhSaWL764Xlg3+JfV0= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.143.26.39 with SMTP id d39mr373819wfj.223.1254234993664; Tue, 29 Sep 2009 07:36:33 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <200909281309.28016.phma@phma.optus.nu> References: <8ACC341D-55A8-4AE8-BEFA-04CFB310ADE1@choi.name> <7f1d42860909280852x6bc9cb0cnd93ed5620469156f@mail.gmail.com> <200909281309.28016.phma@phma.optus.nu> Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 10:36:33 -0400 Message-ID: <96f789a60909290736x1be8fdb8kfaccce0e11fc3770@mail.gmail.com> Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: klama vs. litru From: Michael Turniansky To: lojban-beginners@lojban.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-archive-position: 2424 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: mturniansky@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-beginners@lojban.org X-list: lojban-beginners Content-Length: 1365 On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 1:09 PM, Pierre Abbat wrote: > On Monday 28 September 2009 11:52:03 Ryan Leach wrote: >> And how does muvdu enter into this little number too, since we're asking? >> >> On Sun, Sep 27, 2009 at 1:42 PM, Joshua Choi wrote: >> > The baseline definition of litru is: "x1 travels/journeys/goes/moves via >> > route x2 using means/vehicle x3. x1 is a traveller." klama also means "x1 >> > is a traveller" in the baseline, but includes two more sumti. >> > >> > When should I use litru, and when should I use klama? > > If you go from one place to another, do klama. If you go around in circles, or > go sightseeing without intending to end up in a particular place, do litru. > As to "muvdu", it has a route, but no vehicle. I'm not sure why it's there. > > pu le nu tavla le gugdrnubi* ke djini jitro kei la filipos. muvdu la actod. le > dargu zi'o I don't know what the reference is, but I assume you meant "djine"? (it seems that, like me, you probably associate the gismu with the Genie of the Ring....) As for muvdu, a lo klama (it seems to me) is self-propelled, whereas lo muvdu need not be. This is also distinct in muvgau vs. klagau. The first would refer to moving something (a game piece, a rock, etc.), while the second is usually to bring someone. IMO YMMV --gejyspa