DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to         :content-type;        b=tRGGX3kvx/ClVgjqAgYaRMJyYmHtkTorT42joKYyvRv96+ZIBOyLI4koDDGecTpnZH         9kh6NthLY5qXJuDnjtCbB6u2usCdsaqQUqD7Aezsmzn/ST9gCROfh76MYdo9ouK1RiSZ         Xx0puQl9G7kGBWNtNQuaPLWWTgjoCSWyCtC28=
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <429fde40912141716h2ebb6d8cy928a4cc2eed97235@mail.gmail.com>
References: <429fde40912141716h2ebb6d8cy928a4cc2eed97235@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 23:13:08 -0300
Message-ID: <925d17560912141813k3e14fd91q2fb40366f0091272@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: xorlo, lo'e, and le'e
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Llamb=EDas?= <jjllambias@gmail.com>
To: lojban-beginners@lojban.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-to: lojban-beginners@lojban.org
Content-Length: 776

On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 10:16 PM, Joshua Choi <joshua@choi.name> wrote:
>
> Under the xorlo reform, the articles in the LA and LE selma'o are
> reformed. However, two articles in LE are not mentioned at all in
> either the informal or formal proposals of xorlo: lo'e and le'e. What
> is the status of these cmavo after xorlo? Are they deprecated? Or are
> they included in xorlo? Or are they unchanged?

The significant point of xorlo is that sumti without an explicit outer
quantifier are not to be taken as quantifying the bridi they appear
in. In that sense, all sumti are affected, whether it's a sumti from
KOhA or one headed by LE, LA, LAhE, LI, LU, ZO, etc.

But other than that, I think they remain unchanged (i.e. as little
understood as before).

mu'o mi'e xorxes