Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Sun, 21 Mar 2010 16:07:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1NtUF6-0003lh-0P for lojban-beginners-real@lojban.org; Sun, 21 Mar 2010 16:07:36 -0700 Received: from mail-fx0-f218.google.com ([209.85.220.218]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1NtUEw-0003kS-9x for lojban-beginners@lojban.org; Sun, 21 Mar 2010 16:07:32 -0700 Received: by fxm10 with SMTP id 10so1908985fxm.10 for ; Sun, 21 Mar 2010 16:07:19 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=Mqm7SMHUw58xREIWCaOZ0Ccg104P8funBj77g+Rt89E=; b=OodlvyblhVcol2fznNpOJFOirKWq+8jgAtfB8bmyA+NUMXsLf6Psi8RVCgFahy3F2/ a36N1SYYrY7yxRPd8IsAN9a5jJxWzwwbGqwmuezoqW6H0uYWsavg2AFEmpNLZILWn2yu OHJxXNWBawsqW8bYw0AQ5R2fO4CV7zvLGQzNA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=aSwg4BFJp3+G3kez7ym+nGIjNewuajj9mkwQGJwnRbsLiIjL8OQXVoAa8+X3sF5VB8 Qws6ZSqd+GZdH/z0AP3gz1usj4Elzeu47Yqo6iHkt3vOvwdSGq7z2wVumrmRCVqhFXzA DszgADQZ0a7nvhJVppsO9Nn81I17PPGzLb6/4= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.73.82 with SMTP id p18mr4329122faj.34.1269212839256; Sun, 21 Mar 2010 16:07:19 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <925d17561003211046s6e0035ddj9a6144fa453de11@mail.gmail.com> References: <5715b9301003210025q7f680f5eo50b3e7d76c38f116@mail.gmail.com> <925d17561003210712r4b4a02f7l1531cf6997f361c7@mail.gmail.com> <5715b9301003211010h21ddaf0ch95f5f80ae56de924@mail.gmail.com> <925d17561003211043w34812aa9p8f5b0b323657e06@mail.gmail.com> <925d17561003211046s6e0035ddj9a6144fa453de11@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2010 16:07:19 -0700 Message-ID: <16d9defd1003211607v44b3b829xb62d34a3b76b5308@mail.gmail.com> Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: .imu'ibo From: chris kerr To: lojban-beginners@lojban.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by Ecartis X-archive-position: 3056 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: letsclimbhigher@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-beginners@lojban.org X-list: lojban-beginners Content-Length: 357 Why was this xoxes? If "pu" had equaled "fi'o purci" it seems like everything would have been more intuitive. Personally I find it odd that the sumti that "pu" eats (when it's not in front of a selbri), is what's in the future. codrus 2010/3/21 Jorge Llambías : > Notice that "pu" = "fi'o se purci", while "mu'i" = "fi'o mukti".