Received: from mail-qy0-f155.google.com ([209.85.221.155]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1O3Ums-0005o6-8k; Sun, 18 Apr 2010 06:43:57 -0700 Received: by qyk27 with SMTP id 27sf7348765qyk.22 for ; Sun, 18 Apr 2010 06:43:44 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:x-beenthere:received:received:received :received:received-spf:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:date:received:message-id:subject:from:to :x-original-authentication-results:x-original-sender:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=iyh494p4IxWS1ccqQsz2CKLArpL9SsQpX6FQLmoUWLA=; b=s3zU/KMct4EXjKosYNHvWTdNQmpGZ3sbQ3KE/tHfOgcvwHoL7y2cqZ7+th2ZwuDGd3 n6TJon+FX34zxShtM8eJ4v5ayGGfqaMm94wIiNYdiWE87x4j9j4KNChjV5+1JNSOeujJ xk7fH2LIkyGBAyxQx+hgQNtXI3tWcx1yPNkYk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-authentication-results :x-original-sender:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id :list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; b=OpTN2MKREhgd04ViD3CstmJpQSHftP2oq1lMxrZtgvMkMw576QS0r/7uJTSNdWDCdC K2Mk145p052euXh0Z3tcGWS4mYKB0xHOBPo1JkIzAgNLuwsqzOY4OEIA8+Ceb2o9JKn9 y3oZ7gOgm33QA6hPYOmcmUwtAHY58dp2W4oj8= Received: by 10.224.115.28 with SMTP id g28mr303734qaq.45.1271598221324; Sun, 18 Apr 2010 06:43:41 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.224.59.82 with SMTP id k18ls4559416qah.5.p; Sun, 18 Apr 2010 06:43:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.224.17.201 with SMTP id t9mr506587qaa.16.1271598220272; Sun, 18 Apr 2010 06:43:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.224.17.201 with SMTP id t9mr506585qaa.16.1271598220217; Sun, 18 Apr 2010 06:43:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from qw-out-1920.google.com (qw-out-1920.google.com [74.125.92.149]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id 19si835778qyk.9.2010.04.18.06.43.39; Sun, 18 Apr 2010 06:43:39 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 74.125.92.149 as permitted sender) client-ip=74.125.92.149; Received: by qw-out-1920.google.com with SMTP id 5so1116180qwc.16 for ; Sun, 18 Apr 2010 06:43:39 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.79.75 with HTTP; Sun, 18 Apr 2010 06:43:38 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <09da87a4-5d57-45d1-8de6-489ad02aea24@z7g2000yqb.googlegroups.com> <4BCADA37.6010202@perpetuum-immobile.de> Date: Sun, 18 Apr 2010 10:43:38 -0300 Received: by 10.229.211.140 with SMTP id go12mr5515534qcb.32.1271598219014; Sun, 18 Apr 2010 06:43:39 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban-beginners] About {mi cu facki di'e} From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Llamb=EDas?= To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 74.125.92.149 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=jjllambias@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com X-Original-Sender: jjllambias@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com; contact lojban-beginners+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Length: 1597 On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 7:53 AM, David Gowers <00ai99@gmail.com> wrote: > > {mi cu facki la'e di'e .i mi nelci lonu citka} > seems a bit idiomatic and possibly repetitive, in fact, to me it reads like > "I discover [the-me-who-likes-eating]. I like eating" > Or maybe "I discover the liking-to-eat aspect of me-ness" to be more > literal. It's more like: "I discover the following fact: I like eating." > I'd still argue that this is a bit of an awkward phrasing. I don't see any problem with it, though of course there are other ways of saying similar things. > {mi facki lo du'u mi nelci lo nu citka} also works if facki is of > primary importance rather than discursive. Yes. > I think du'u may be incorrect in this context, though.. A liking is > really more of an event than a fact, given it can change over time. > > {mi facki lo canu mi nelci lo nu citka} > -- changing the meaning slightly to be a bit more specific, "I > discover that I currently.." The choice between "du'u" and "nu" doesn't really depend on what a liking is, but on what a se facki is. A se facki is a fact. So if what you discover is that you currently like eating, that would be: "mi facki lo du'u mi ca nelci lo nu citka". mu'o mi'e xorxes -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lojban Beginners" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=en.