Received: from mail-qy0-f162.google.com ([209.85.221.162]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1O3e6z-0001lW-Kk; Sun, 18 Apr 2010 16:41:18 -0700 Received: by qyk34 with SMTP id 34sf8019900qyk.21 for ; Sun, 18 Apr 2010 16:41:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:x-beenthere:received:received:received :received:received-spf:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:date:received:message-id:subject:from:to :x-original-authentication-results:x-original-sender:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=gMfiNPkg954dhsMKDNFn5I3icoZlfO/DT317tIOEH/c=; b=IxkQN/cX//NhSlyXCoSd7aGAMDVRF6H6Z62mhB4sa0zECdQ7fPFFeXggKVyqGboQtb zFZCIFjo+MZUEsUeSMF7fWiMJjdkgg+0BmVUltQ0KnhiiYA34kp51km7eT5ttKMhFwYj d32g47TAAHpEH2hjKYp9uIvk0sYPq8X7EdXT4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-authentication-results :x-original-sender:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id :list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=lYsAaNIJdlO90BsrIZvB0i1CBeqvok9t3C1vdvE3M6vNbfw4arh1Z/eAPuhYuKH1xj LwgTUXKCBqtaYaHScjizt1mCzbJGoMR6sSsLwe8Mo8ui08VjMgYX2WRBYTgjYNVTwCZT 1HyFoaOSGZEzLE7J8MR8L8n+FFGsorK5I/JH0= Received: by 10.229.1.153 with SMTP id 25mr260136qcf.16.1271634064671; Sun, 18 Apr 2010 16:41:04 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.229.210.31 with SMTP id gi31ls7977971qcb.0.p; Sun, 18 Apr 2010 16:41:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.115.65 with SMTP id h1mr455970qcq.23.1271634063545; Sun, 18 Apr 2010 16:41:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.115.65 with SMTP id h1mr455969qcq.23.1271634063509; Sun, 18 Apr 2010 16:41:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from qw-out-2122.google.com (qw-out-2122.google.com [74.125.92.24]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id 19si932908qyk.5.2010.04.18.16.41.02; Sun, 18 Apr 2010 16:41:02 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 74.125.92.24 as permitted sender) client-ip=74.125.92.24; Received: by qw-out-2122.google.com with SMTP id 9so1488286qwb.65 for ; Sun, 18 Apr 2010 16:41:02 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.79.75 with HTTP; Sun, 18 Apr 2010 16:41:02 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sun, 18 Apr 2010 20:41:02 -0300 Received: by 10.229.14.157 with SMTP id g29mr2234435qca.57.1271634062210; Sun, 18 Apr 2010 16:41:02 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban-beginners] cei From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Llamb=EDas?= To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 74.125.92.24 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=jjllambias@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com X-Original-Sender: jjllambias@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com; contact lojban-beginners+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Length: 1245 On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 8:07 PM, tijlan wrote: > Is it grammatical to introduce a lujvo with "cei" following a tanru, > even if no pro-bridi is involved, like this: > > =A0ti carna nalci vinji cei carna'ivinji It's grammatical, but the question is, what does it mean? "cei" identifies the two predicates it joins, but a tanru and the lujvo made with the tanru elements usually will be two different predicates. The tanru has the same place structure of the rightmost element. (Except when "co" is involved, then things get complicated.) The lujvo will have its own usually different place structure, based on the arguments of all of its components. So strictly speaking it would not make sense to connect a lujvo and a tanru with "cei" that way, unless you are defining the lujvo as having the same meaning of the tanru. mu'o mi'e xorxes --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= Lojban Beginners" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@= googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= -beginners?hl=3Den.