Received: from mail-qy0-f162.google.com ([209.85.221.162]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1O3eV3-0003Rz-HG; Sun, 18 Apr 2010 17:06:11 -0700 Received: by qyk34 with SMTP id 34sf8051012qyk.21 for ; Sun, 18 Apr 2010 17:05:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:x-beenthere:received:received:received :received:received-spf:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:date:received:message-id:subject:from:to :x-original-authentication-results:x-original-sender:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=4mWV/XZMip2I0r6cSla+6P1ywRkAa0zQASQGhpaXfJA=; b=VDh13WAXU0AiLQ5q/PyL2VfFg/1/tsEtzFNhYocEUr+JX9radLKmM0FZ3ZAPWSyKvU t1BqRGUWvk9sOulHddg2XZuI15+t5p6XcL+S5C7SCGiLUvh3e0FsaZym0gvnMmivYLeC 4BgR9RKB0GCZnmy6GrTB9t2rDycszRxZjkH5Q= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-authentication-results :x-original-sender:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id :list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; b=FjgmplTMvSSeCAgfY6LPS4byhOjnl8awRqRLEC6bE4vj/skmWWxbbHKqlA7hHdMtls q2lp40aeVJT+xQTruzIA3eiLOmzHWNcTNXttWe20QiBXB///GwShKfEE9mqaRB9yJufi LOlMChBZGFT3igzCxYw5gE6SPsKAW1UD6OP0o= Received: by 10.224.39.14 with SMTP id d14mr357540qae.35.1271635556751; Sun, 18 Apr 2010 17:05:56 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.224.42.12 with SMTP id q12ls5514757qae.0.p; Sun, 18 Apr 2010 17:05:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.224.93.210 with SMTP id w18mr570616qam.10.1271635555792; Sun, 18 Apr 2010 17:05:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.224.93.210 with SMTP id w18mr570615qam.10.1271635555762; Sun, 18 Apr 2010 17:05:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from qw-out-1920.google.com (qw-out-1920.google.com [74.125.92.147]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id 25si932332qyk.15.2010.04.18.17.05.54; Sun, 18 Apr 2010 17:05:54 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 74.125.92.147 as permitted sender) client-ip=74.125.92.147; Received: by qw-out-1920.google.com with SMTP id 9so827922qwj.64 for ; Sun, 18 Apr 2010 17:05:54 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.79.75 with HTTP; Sun, 18 Apr 2010 17:05:54 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <09da87a4-5d57-45d1-8de6-489ad02aea24@z7g2000yqb.googlegroups.com> <4BCADA37.6010202@perpetuum-immobile.de> Date: Sun, 18 Apr 2010 21:05:54 -0300 Received: by 10.229.250.206 with SMTP id mp14mr3762052qcb.62.1271635554319; Sun, 18 Apr 2010 17:05:54 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban-beginners] About {mi cu facki di'e} From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Llamb=EDas?= To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 74.125.92.147 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=jjllambias@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com X-Original-Sender: jjllambias@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com; contact lojban-beginners+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Length: 3323 On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 8:28 PM, David Gowers <00ai99@gmail.com> wrote: > > Referent is like expanding the named clause (in this case, the next > bridi), right? > I confused the referent (mi nelci lonu citka) with the subject (mi). The "referent" is the "se sinxa", the thing that a sign refers to. The referent of the sumti "lo mi pendo" is my friend. (Not the words "my friend", the person I refer to with the words "lo mi pendo".) The referent of a sentence is the proposition that that sentence expresses. >> The choice between "du'u" and "nu" doesn't really depend on what a >> liking is, but on what a se facki is. A se facki is a fact. > > I took your initial point (pay attention to explicit > 'this-place-contains-an-XYZ' markers); however a se facki (ie. du'u) > is not a fact, it's a predicate; that is, it's something that *can* be > true, rather than something that *is* true. Well... This could be a long discussion, but I would say that only facts can be discovered. If you think you discover something that later turns out not to be a fact, will you still claim that you discovered something? If someone else mistakenly believes that they have discovered something, but you know that that something is not a fact, will you report that as "they discovered X"? I wouldn't. I think discovering X, like knowing X, requires X to be a fact. But in any case, yes, that aside, the issue here was that the x2 of facki has to be a "lo du'u ...". > (this is rather trivial to illustrate with Newton's Law; not 'TRUE', > but a valid observation that fit the evidence and continued to do so > for some time) Suppose I mistakenly believe that I have discovered that you are a murderer. Will you happily say to someone else "he discovered that I am a murderer". If yes, then for you "discover X" indeed does not require X to be a fact. If you would not report my presumed discovery that way, why not? > As far as I understand the idea of 'fact's, they denote an idea which > significant (say, >50%) probability is assigned to (typically through > collective observation and agreement). On the other hand, a > du'u/predicate only has to have some probability (that is, nonzero; it > could be as small as 10^-30 %). That places 'the sky is blue' and 'we > were designed by an omnipotent god' as both being du'u* (which > evidently would be a substantial problem if du'u or se facki really > was representative of facts.) A du'u predicate could be 100% false. "lo du'u lo mluni cu marji lo crino cirla cu jitfa" is true. A jitfa is a false du'u, just like a se facki, a se djuno or indeed a jetnu are true du'u. > * if you accept the premise that assigning probabilities of exactly 0 > or 1 is statistically nonsensical. > >> So if what >> you discover is that you currently like eating, that would be: "mi >> facki lo du'u mi ca nelci lo nu citka". >> > > Thanks for helping me understand time tense binding a bit better :) je'e mu'o mi'e xorxes -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lojban Beginners" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=en.