Received: from mail-gx0-f198.google.com ([209.85.217.198]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1O3ygP-00055Y-Qt; Mon, 19 Apr 2010 14:39:15 -0700 Received: by gxk22 with SMTP id 22sf4413798gxk.4 for ; Mon, 19 Apr 2010 14:39:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:x-beenthere:received:received:received :received:received:received-spf:received:mime-version:sender :received:in-reply-to:references:date:received:message-id:subject :from:to:x-original-authentication-results:x-original-sender :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help :list-archive:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=MAzwuw3WUanFVwLgmUqY3LlHLICFehAYo8aUBXfcF6A=; b=I0NI4npol3qhIY7E4vyupeGGBWzpcPOEpNVN1pPZGyBT63m47worDcXwsib/4MOHyI iUUmQq/XH0KHppZSILINHGwKuaR9vjLpS6Xv7RiDb0V6T6mRhb2UhpVSeTFbIXYSpZKW 7kE2l2nbJIWptsCeSmvao5PgjlYublLcZNmzk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-authentication-results :x-original-sender:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id :list-post:list-help:list-archive:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe :content-type; b=0Xa6pZ22SVkDTLHNzclaZbQeXezX3ePn6QldbrhZ1vkdjbFWZZq+yl/ykIBYqRW4Us W3A/+yZMhcAG3yTZGRFO94UJwznpgOnDMc7sphU9Q2Tk5No/I6Z0Abv2ZCdF0X//WMNh EBFsXLPgCNs9AsMJD768W4tEcnawX77UeB9FM= Received: by 10.91.91.9 with SMTP id t9mr1691344agl.20.1271713140435; Mon, 19 Apr 2010 14:39:00 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.87.8.39 with SMTP id l39ls1314565fgi.2.p; Mon, 19 Apr 2010 14:38:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.87.50.30 with SMTP id c30mr67447fgk.0.1271713139335; Mon, 19 Apr 2010 14:38:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.153.146 with SMTP id f18mr556130wek.1.1271713047163; Mon, 19 Apr 2010 14:37:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.153.146 with SMTP id f18mr556129wek.1.1271713047125; Mon, 19 Apr 2010 14:37:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-qy0-f182.google.com (mail-qy0-f182.google.com [209.85.221.182]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id g1si2561500wbg.2.2010.04.19.14.37.25; Mon, 19 Apr 2010 14:37:26 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of pascal.akihiko@gmail.com designates 209.85.221.182 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.221.182; Received: by mail-qy0-f182.google.com with SMTP id 12so5992798qyk.21 for ; Mon, 19 Apr 2010 14:37:25 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.229.111.102 with HTTP; Mon, 19 Apr 2010 14:37:25 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2010 22:37:25 +0100 Received: by 10.229.191.1 with SMTP id dk1mr2500978qcb.18.1271713045517; Mon, 19 Apr 2010 14:37:25 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban-beginners] cei From: tijlan To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of pascal.akihiko@gmail.com designates 209.85.221.182 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=pascal.akihiko@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com X-Original-Sender: pascal.akihiko@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com; contact lojban-beginners+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016363b85f65597fc04849dc48a Content-Length: 6038 --0016363b85f65597fc04849dc48a Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 19 April 2010 20:29, Geoffrey Stewart wrote: > > > 2010/4/18 Jorge Llamb=EDas > > On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 8:07 PM, tijlan wrote= : >> > Is it grammatical to introduce a lujvo with "cei" following a tanru, >> > even if no pro-bridi is involved, like this: >> > >> > ti carna nalci vinji cei carna'ivinji >> >> It's grammatical, but the question is, what does it mean? >> >> "cei" identifies the two predicates it joins, but a tanru and the >> lujvo made with the tanru elements usually will be two different >> predicates. >> >> The tanru has the same place structure of the rightmost element. >> (Except when "co" is involved, then things get complicated.) >> >> The lujvo will have its own usually different place structure, based >> on the arguments of all of its components. So strictly speaking it >> would not make sense to connect a lujvo and a tanru with "cei" that >> way, unless you are defining the lujvo as having the same meaning of >> the tanru. >> >> > I think that was what he was trying to do, seeing how the rafsi his lujvo > is composed of are from the gismu in the tanru. > Yes, and I didn't pay enough attention to the probable asymmetry between th= e place structures of each connected selbri. Also, according to jbofi'e, "cei= " would assign "carna'ivinji" only to the tertau "vinji": [ ( ti ) << | | carna nalci | vinji cei carna'ivinji | >> ] (... which appears to me odd though, since the official definition says the target of "cei" is a selbri, not a brivla, and this "vinji" is not an individual selbri.) I should have used "zei": ti carna zei nalci zei vinji cei carna'ivinji [ ( ti ) << | carna zei nalci zei vinji | cei carna'ivinji >> ] mu'o mi'e tijlan --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= Lojban Beginners" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@= googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= -beginners?hl=3Den. --0016363b85f65597fc04849dc48a Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On 19 April 2010 20:29, Geoffrey Stewart <geoffstewart56@g= mail.com> wrote:


2010/4/18 Jorge Llamb=EDas <= ;jjllambias@gmail= .com>

On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 8:07 PM, tijlan <jbotijlan@googlemail.com> wrote:=
> Is it grammatical to introduce a lujvo with "cei" follow= ing a tanru,
> even if no pro-bridi is involved, like this:
>
> =A0ti car= na nalci vinji cei carna'ivinji

It's grammatical, but = the question is, what does it mean?

"cei" identifies the t= wo predicates it joins, but a tanru and the
lujvo made with the tanru elements usually will be two different
predica= tes.

The tanru has the same place structure of the rightmost element= .
(Except when "co" is involved, then things get complicated.)=

The lujvo will have its own usually different place structure, basedon the arguments of all of its components. So strictly speaking it
woul= d not make sense to connect a lujvo and a tanru with "cei" that way, unless you are defining the lujvo as having the same meaning of
the= tanru.
=A0
I think that was what he was trying to do, seeing how the rafsi = his lujvo is composed of are from the=A0gismu=A0in the tanru.

Yes, and I didn't pay enough attention to the proba= ble asymmetry between the place structures of each connected selbri. Also, = according to jbofi'e, "cei" would assign "carna'ivin= ji" only to the tertau "vinji":

=A0[ ( ti ) << | | carna nalci = | vinji cei carna'ivinji | >= > ]

(... which appears to me odd though, since the official defin= ition says the target of "cei" is a selbri, not a brivla, and thi= s "vinji" is not an individual selbri.)

I should have used "zei":

=A0ti carna zei nalci zei vi= nji cei carna'ivinji
=A0[ ( ti ) << | carna zei nalci zei vinj= i | cei carna'ivinji >> ]

mu'o mi'e tijlan

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= Lojban Beginners" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@= googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= -beginners?hl=3Den.
--0016363b85f65597fc04849dc48a--