Received: from mail-px0-f189.google.com ([209.85.212.189]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1OATV2-000396-KT; Fri, 07 May 2010 12:46:27 -0700 Received: by pxi13 with SMTP id 13sf346605pxi.16 for ; Fri, 07 May 2010 12:46:10 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:x-beenthere:received:received:received :received:received:received-spf:received:received:date:from:to :subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references:mime-version :in-reply-to:organization:user-agent :x-original-authentication-results:x-original-sender:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type :content-disposition; bh=l7El1ojbxYdf2y4ia297Bp13Wf6oTTMO1Rz7jcDmmyQ=; b=3FURXziyve0ftMq2xCDj3wVGzEXRs9FxdP982mU5ecf7llj29Gtm0jPzfyZc/42EL+ JcWdX+BajKk4aSflUCbRlxqBvZGWyxwYwWZxjA2e3mtpYKUELZeEIybY6R14Fdi4S19d CbPlbSrkh3GRd3afyqHCjPDS2RIWSiEiObumM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:date:from:to:subject:message-id :mail-followup-to:references:mime-version:in-reply-to:organization :user-agent:x-original-authentication-results:x-original-sender :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help :list-archive:sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type :content-disposition; b=d2PwFalI1jlj0+pv/9E4Op7UPXW9XHvjX/D6NR4r+4AAc0qOMfWNLNyxHLl+HJ1PL3 as33FpVA5DA/5aA2lqXcuJ7xIJxE8FsA8EaOmOjaof++9ZdIga7eefAbytEkjYWDmucr EErF9Af5K7/5EiRz/0OxZ0j8gf+WS8MzntJyk= Received: by 10.141.124.13 with SMTP id b13mr51263rvn.25.1273261567872; Fri, 07 May 2010 12:46:07 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.140.255.17 with SMTP id c17ls9176858rvi.2.p; Fri, 07 May 2010 12:46:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.141.124.4 with SMTP id b4mr54587rvn.13.1273261567438; Fri, 07 May 2010 12:46:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.115.87.20 with SMTP id p20mr24930wal.16.1273174390694; Thu, 06 May 2010 12:33:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.115.87.20 with SMTP id p20mr24929wal.16.1273174390656; Thu, 06 May 2010 12:33:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sdf.lonestar.org (mx.freeshell.org [192.94.73.19]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id r3si1010201waj.3.2010.05.06.12.33.10; Thu, 06 May 2010 12:33:10 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 192.94.73.19 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of jwodder@sdf.lonestar.org) client-ip=192.94.73.19; Received: from sdf.lonestar.org (IDENT:jwodder@sverige.freeshell.org [192.94.73.4]) by sdf.lonestar.org (8.14.4/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o46JXAJI022174 for ; Thu, 6 May 2010 19:33:10 GMT Received: (from jwodder@localhost) by sdf.lonestar.org (8.14.4/8.12.8/Submit) id o46JXAbd014512 for lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com; Thu, 6 May 2010 19:33:10 GMT Date: Thu, 6 May 2010 19:33:10 +0000 From: Minimiscience To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban-beginners] BY1 Message-ID: <20100506193309.GA10160@sdf.lonestar.org> Mail-Followup-To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com References: MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Organization: SDF Public Access UNIX System User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 192.94.73.19 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of jwodder@sdf.lonestar.org) smtp.mail=jwodder@sdf.lonestar.org X-Original-Sender: minimiscience@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com; contact lojban-beginners+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Length: 1110 de'i li 05 pi'e 05 pi'e 2010 la'o fy. tijlan .fy. cusku zoi skamyxatra. > Does jbofi'e parse BY1 correctly? This is what it says: ... > {ga'e} and {to'a} are {broda}'s x1 and x2? .skamyxatra Yes, they are. Any string of BY {cmavo} is a {lerfu} string, which can serve as a pro-{sumti}. The fact that the {cmavo} are in BY1 and not BY2 is irrelevant to the grammar; sub-{selma'o} exist only to indicate semantic divisions to humans. > Is {ce'a lerfu. bu} supposed to be a sumti? Yes. A LAU and a {lerfu} word together form a {lerfu} word, which can always be used as a one-element {lerfu} string, and thus as a pro-{sumti}, regardless of whether it makes any semantic sense. mu'omi'e .kamymecraijun. -- do la terjvi ganai pensi gi fliba -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lojban Beginners" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=en.