Received: from mail-wy0-f189.google.com ([74.125.82.189]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1OBrqS-0003VW-SO; Tue, 11 May 2010 08:58:14 -0700 Received: by wyb36 with SMTP id 36sf2290580wyb.16 for ; Tue, 11 May 2010 08:58:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:x-beenthere:received:received:received :received:received-spf:received:mime-version:received:received :in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :x-original-authentication-results:x-original-sender:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=I6fs7I4dPi/H69/CkvkB3lvJj/gMSAp80wCfF0kYl/E=; b=VeEXu0rGWZbmzHFw83f1ULI8TblElursly2HKxbVdlkVAdONBx/H1ZVhC8MEcrvkDX 4qfeTeSxES2vssDDoEeAD9DQtPnfXukzrwawpzOO3ZStKFyEjESfF3C7gWXmDZ8aYc9Z 5lkUQbkWp8+XaitX2N5Pdz8hrfK2inn1CW/8k= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-authentication-results :x-original-sender:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id :list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; b=Uf3MP72jFZqa5+BwZsZ5wU2dOLPNb1eFNYH/nZzr6UxN67qFJo66L+nrzh2Fa8kO2t dPDhUc8E22V9jnECHl1Ds96cjATmD+s9v48ZN7tqncuh/CX92l90Js3fnfKlkAK0BvcP 8cgFzh7bWc2N/8FsHeuiPhOn6S8eoHgHRyj7M= Received: by 10.223.63.210 with SMTP id c18mr665401fai.20.1273593479233; Tue, 11 May 2010 08:57:59 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.213.59.76 with SMTP id k12ls5199286ebh.3.p; Tue, 11 May 2010 08:57:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.213.56.8 with SMTP id w8mr772033ebg.8.1273593477144; Tue, 11 May 2010 08:57:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.213.56.8 with SMTP id w8mr772032ebg.8.1273593476897; Tue, 11 May 2010 08:57:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-vw0-f50.google.com (mail-vw0-f50.google.com [209.85.212.50]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id 11si444196ewy.5.2010.05.11.08.57.55; Tue, 11 May 2010 08:57:55 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of lukeabergen@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.50 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.212.50; Received: by mail-vw0-f50.google.com with SMTP id 10so594359vws.9 for ; Tue, 11 May 2010 08:57:55 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.123.136 with SMTP id p8mr4642483vcr.104.1273593474032; Tue, 11 May 2010 08:57:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.94.77 with HTTP; Tue, 11 May 2010 08:57:53 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4BE97DBB.4060404@perpetuum-immobile.de> References: <4BE97DBB.4060404@perpetuum-immobile.de> Date: Tue, 11 May 2010 11:57:53 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban-beginners] sei vs to From: Luke Bergen To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of lukeabergen@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.50 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=lukeabergen@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com X-Original-Sender: lukeabergen@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com; contact lojban-beginners+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e68f9c1b9ba6040486539618 Content-Length: 4720 --0016e68f9c1b9ba6040486539618 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 That brings up a question for me. In that sentence that you gave tijlan, what about the text tells us that the {fi lo cukta...} applies to the {prali} and not to the {pensi}? Does {sei} take a bridi, a selbri, or something else? What terminates a {sei} or is the idea of terminating {sei} as absurd as terminating {zo}? I've perused the CLL but {sei} isn't documented very well there from what I have found. On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 11:54 AM, Timo Paulssen < timonator@perpetuum-immobile.de> wrote: > tijlan wrote: > > {sei} and {to}... When should we use which? What is the difference > between a > > discursive element and a parenthetical element? > > > > mu'o mi'e tijlan > > In my experience, a sei is more special. You can use it in place of > words like {pe'i}, {ka'u}, {ja'o} and friends. So in la alis you will > find a sentence like {ma prali sei la alis pensi fi lo cukta be cau lo > pixra} or something similar. > > {to}, on the other hand would be something you'd say yourself, while if > you find a sei in a quote, it could very well also come from the quoter. > > mu'o mi'e timos > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Lojban Beginners" group. > To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lojban Beginners" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=en. --0016e68f9c1b9ba6040486539618 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable That brings up a question for me. =A0In that sentence that you gave tijlan,= what about the text tells us that the {fi lo cukta...} applies to the {pra= li} and not to the {pensi}? =A0Does {sei} take a bridi, a selbri, or someth= ing else? =A0What terminates a {sei} or is the idea of terminating {sei} as= absurd as terminating {zo}? =A0I've perused the CLL but {sei} isn'= t documented very well there from what I have found.

On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 11:54 AM, Timo Pauls= sen <timonator@perpetuum-immobile.de> wrote:
tijlan wrote:
> {sei} and {to}... When should we use which? What is the difference bet= ween a
> discursive element and a parenthetical element?
>
> mu'o mi'e tijlan

In my experience, a sei is more special. You can use it in place of words like {pe'i}, {ka'u}, {ja'o} and friends. So in la alis yo= u will
find a sentence like {ma prali sei la alis pensi fi lo cukta be cau lo
pixra} or something similar.

{to}, on the other hand would be something you'd say yourself, while if=
you find a sei in a quote, it could very well also come from the quoter.
mu'o mi'e timos

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;Lojban Beginners" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegr= oups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/g= roup/lojban-beginners?hl=3Den.


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= Lojban Beginners" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@= googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= -beginners?hl=3Den.
--0016e68f9c1b9ba6040486539618--